APHC010378382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19137/2025 Between: 1. KOMMINENI BHAGEERADHA, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O KAMMAVARIPALLE VILLAGE, DIRASAVANCHA GRAMPANCHAYAT, B.MATTAMMANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. PANYAM BHARATHI, W/OBALANARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC HOME MAKER, R/O D. NO. 1-134, EGUVANELATUR VILLAGE, B.MATTAMMANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. ANAKARLASREENIVASULU, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D. NO. 4/6/1-2-67, VALLERUVARIPALLI VILLAGE, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MYDUKURU, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, B MATTAM POLICE STATION, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. TALARI JAYACHANDRAPAAL, S/O JANAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, OCC NOT KNOWN, R/O REKALAKUNTA VILLAGE, 2 B.MATTAMMANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 in interfering with life and liberty of the petitioners and repeatedly calling the petitioners to the police station to settle the civil dispute with 5th respondent with regard to the land admeasuring an extent of Ac. 4.171 cents situated in survey No. 428, bearing LP No. 1209 of Rekulakunta Village, B Mattam Mandal, Kadapa District and threatening to implicate in false cases, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and rights guaranteed under Art 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to harass the petitioners, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to interfere with life and liberty of petitioners and not to harass the petitioners, pending disposal of main Writ Petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondent No.3 in interfering with life and liberty of the petitioners and repeatedly calling the petitioners to the police station to settle the civil dispute with 5th respondent with regard to the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.171 cents situated in survey No.428, bearing LP No.1209 of Rekulakunta Village, B Mattam Mandal, Kadapa District and threatening to implicate in false cases, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and rights guaranteed under Art 21 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to harass the petitioners and to pass such other order or orders..” 2. Heard Sri V.Sreenivasa Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no crime has been registered against the petitioners; it is only a civil dispute between the petitioners and unofficial respondent. The Police are calling the petitioners to the Police Station and interfering in the civil matter, and a direction may be given not to call the petitioners to the Police Station. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the 3rd and 4th respondents are directed not to call the petitioners to the Police 4 Station in the absence of registration of any crime against them. The Police are further directed to follow the procedure according to law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.07.2025 JLV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19137 of 2025 Dated.24.07.2025 JLV 124