Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26674 (KAR)

SMT NANJAMMA v. SRI L LAKSHMAN

CRP/88/2019 · 2025-02-11

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6083 CRP No. 88 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 88 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SMT NANJAMMA W/O LATE VARADHAIAH AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS, R/O MANTANAKURCHI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H H SHETTY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI L LAKSHMAN S/O V LAKSHMAN AGED ABOUT 38YEARS, 2. SRI L KESHAVA S/O V LAKSHMAN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 3. KUMARI RADHIKA D/O V LAKSHMAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT INDIRANAGARA NEAR POST OFFICE, BURIAL GROUND Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6083 CRP No. 88 of 2019 NELAMANGALA TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123 4. SRI V LAKSHMAN S/O LATE VARADHAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT TEXTILE INSEPCTOR BEHIND SHITIGO BUILDING 7TH CROSS ROAD, B CROSS BAGALAGUNTE, HESARAGHATTA NAGASANDRA ROAD BENGALURU-560073 5. SRI GANGARAJU S/O LATE VARADAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O MANTANAKURCHI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123 6. SMT M.V. PREMA D/O LATE VARDHAIAH W/O LATE SHANTHAMALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.99, C/O R PADMAPRIYA W/O VENUGOPAL, NEAR BEERALINGAESHWARA TEMPLE SUBASHNAGAR, NELAMANGALA TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123 …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2019 PASSED ON IA NO,16 IN OS.NO.74/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA REJECTING THE IA NO.6 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a)(d) FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6083 CRP No. 88 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.74/2006 was dismissed on 13.07.2021. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL