CRM-M-10235-2023 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 269 CRM-M-10235-2023 Decided on : 03.04.2025 Raghveer Singh and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Vishal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jasdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. SANJAY VASHISTH, J. 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 30.08.2022(Annexure P-3), effected between the parties. DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:- FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station District 21 09.03.2021 420, 120-B IPC Moonak Sangrur 2. Vide orders dated 01.04.2024, 04.09.2024 and 18.02.2025, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order. 3. Pursuant to order dated 18.02.2025, learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Moonak submitted its report dated 18.03.2025, wherein it is mentioned that despite granting two effective opportunities, RASHMI 2025.04.04 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10235-2023 2 parties failed in getting their statements recorded. For reference, report dated 18.03.2025 is reproduced herebelow: “ Respected Sir, With reference to the order dated 01.04.2024, 04.09.2024 and 18.02.2025 in CRM-M-10235-2023 passed by Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, on the subject cited above. The Hon’ble High Court had again directed the parties to appear before the Ld. Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements. It is respectfully submitted that the Court had again given two effective opportunities to the parties to appear before the undersigned, but they failed to appear before the Court for recording their statements with regard to the compromise, despite awaiting sufficiently. Therefore, the report is being sent herewith before your goodself, as desired for further necessary action. Date:18.03.2025 Yours Faithfully, Jagmilan Singh Khushdil Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate Moonak (UID-PB00342).” 4. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. 03.04.2025 (SANJAY VASHISTH) rashmi JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RASHMI 2025.04.04 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document