APHC010377502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19405 OF 2025 Between: Maligireddy Anitha Rani, W/o. Hah Krishna Reddy Aged about 38 years, Occ; House Wife, C/o. Kauthubham Nilayam, Flat No. 1, 1 Thavudu Factory, Ippatam Road, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. St Floor, Beside ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bapatia District at Bapatla. 3. The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Bapatla Division, Bapatla District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Santhamaguluru Police Station Santhamaguluru, Bapatla District. 5. The Station House Officer, Santhamaguluru Police Station, Santhamaguluru, Bapatla District. 6. The Tahsildhar, Santhamaguluru Mandal Bapatla District. 7. Arvapalli Venkata Narayana, , S/o. Subrahmanyam Aged 61 years, Occ: Business R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatla District. 8. Ganji Sridhar, S/o. Ramalingaiah, Aged 52 years, Occ; RMP Doctor, R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatla District. 9. Karasani Venkata Koti Reddy Chinnodu, Aged 54 years, Occ: Cultivation R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. 10. Gaddam Srinivasa Reddy, S/o. Rangareddy, Aged 45 years, Occ; Cultivation, R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. 11. Chevuri Vasu Reddy, S/o. Rangareddy, Aged 53 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. 12.Arvapalli Ratnakar F^ao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged 67 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. IS.Arvapalli Rama Rao, , S/o. Ratnakar Rao, Aged 42 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. 14. Arvapalli Praveen Kumar, S/o. Venkata Narayana Aged 35 years, Occ; Business, R/o. Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal Bapatia District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 4 to 5 at the instance of respondents 7 to 14 in frequently interfering in petitioner's possession and enjoyment and insisting her to vacate her schedule property is situated in Santhamaguluru Village in an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents of vacant site/dry land beuring Sy.No. 171/1 and later sub divided as 171/1A9A, and having acquired the same vide document No.6120 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025, situated in Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. While it is so some civil disputes arose petitioner and respondents 7 and 14, as such, petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.117 of 2025 as claiming relief of permanent injunction and the same is pending for adjudication on the file of Learned Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Addanki and the Hon'ble court was pleased to pass an Interim Injunction Order dated 22.04.2025 in I.A.No.251 of 2025 in O.S.No.117/2025 in petitioner favour and the same is still in force., as illegal, irregular, irrational and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere in any manner with petitioner possession over her aforesaid property. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 is filed praying that in the Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's possession over her property in an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents of vacant site/dry land bearing Sy.No. 171/1 and later sub divided as 171/1A9A, and having acquired the same vide document No.6120 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025, situated in Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatia thereof to the custody of District nor insist her to deliver the possession respondents 7 to 14, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KISHORE KUMAR KATARI Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 to 5:SRI V FAROOK, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 6 to 14: — The Court made the following order: APHC010377502025 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PFTITION NO: 19405/2025 IN [3396] THE Between: 1.MALIGIREDDY ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE NILAYAM, FLAT NO. 1,1 ST FLOOR, L IPPATAM ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ANITHA RANI, W/0. HAH KRISHNA REDDY AGED C/0. KAUTHUBHAM BESIDE THAVUDU FACTORY, ...PETITIONER AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL TO GOVERNMENT, HOME 1. THE STATE OF SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT DEPARTMENT 2. THE BAPATLA. 3. THE DIVISIONAL DIVISION, BAPATLA DISTRICT. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA SANTHAMAGULURU POLICE 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE STATION SANTHAMAGULURU, BAPATLA DISTRICT. HOUSE OFFICER, SANTHAMAGULURU POLICE SANTHAMAGULURU, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION STATION, BAPATLA TAHSILDHAR, SANTHAMAGULURU MANUAL 6. THE DISTRICT. S/0. SUBRAHMANYAM R/O. SANTHAMAGULURU 7. ARVAPALLI VENKATA NARAYANA, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS 2 VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. aged 52 YEARS, OCC nAN 11 SRIDHAR, S/0. RAMALINGAIAH RMP DOCTOR, R/0. SANTHAMAGULURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 8. VENKATA KOTl REDDY CHINNODU, AGED 54 YEARS, R/0. SANTHAMAGULURU VILLAGE AND 9. KARASANl OCC CULTIVATION MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. AGED 45 mGADDAM SRINIVASA REDDY, S/0. RANGAREDDY, YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/0. SANTHAMAGULURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. PHFVURI VASU REDDY, S/0. RANGAREDDY, AGED 53 YEARS, 11.CHEVURI VASU RLUU^^ SANTHAMAGULURU VILLAGE AND OCC BUSINESS MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 12.ARVAPALL, RATNAKAR RAO, 67 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/0 AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. I':, ARVAPALLl RAMA RAO, , S/0. RATNAKAR RAO, AGED 42 YEARS CULTIVATION, R/O. SANTHAMAGULURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 14.ARVAPALLl PRAVEEN KUMAR 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O and MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT. S/0. VENKATA NARAYANA AGED . SANTHAMAGULURU VILLAGE ...RESPONDENT(S); Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .KISHORE KUMAR KATARI Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer; ....to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 4 to 5 at the ' of respondents 7 to 14 in frequently interfering in petitioner's WRIT OF instance possession and enjoyment and insisting her to vacate her schedule property is situated in Santhamaguluru Village in an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents of vacant site/dry land bearing Sy.No. 171/1 and later sub divided as 171/1A9A, and having acquired the same vide document No.6120 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025, situated in Santhamaguluru Village and Mandal, Bapatla District. While it is some civil disputes arose petitioner and respondents 7 and 14, as such, petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.117 of 2025 as claiming relief of permanent injunction and the same is pending for adjudication on the file of Learned Court of-the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Addanki and the Hon ble court was pleased to pass an Interim Injunction Order dated 22.04.2025 in l.A.No.251 of 2025 in O.S.No.117/2025 in petitioner favour and the same is still in force., as illegal, irregular, irrational and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere in any with petitioner possession over her aforesaid property and pass...." so manner When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V. Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the matter is purely of a civil nature and the police are not interfering in 2. the civil dispute. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed written instructions on record, received from the Tahsildar, to the effect that the Tahsildar, Santhamagulur, or his staff never interfered with the subject land. 3. I 4 4. Recording the submissions, this the police are directed not to i ' order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous writ petition is disposed of. However, interfere in the civil dispute. There shall be no petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Bapatia District at Bapatla. 3. The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Bapatla Division, Bapatla District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Santhamaguluru Police Station Santhamaguluru, Bapatla District. 5. The Station House Officer, Santhamaguluru Police Station, Santhamaguluru, Bapatla District. 6. The Tahsildhar, Santhamaguluru Mandal Bapatla District. 7. One CC to SRI. KISHORE KUMAR KATARl, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 9. Three CD Copies PRK i HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 19405 OF 2025 ^0 I SEP 2025 ^ ★ ^Sseiisa DISPOSING OF THE WP, WITHOUT COSTS