[2025:RJ-JP:30634] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9882/2025 Kaluram @ Kamal Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh, R/o Sheelganv Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara. At Present In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Sharma for Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/08/2025 1 This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant(s)-accused Kaluram @ Kamal Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh in FIR No. 357/2025 dated 20.07.2025 registered at P.S. Mundawar, District -Khairthal Tijara, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2 The applicant was arrested and has in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail applica- tion. 3 Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is inno- cent and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that recovered quantity is less than commercial. He further submits that police has not complied the mandatory [2025:RJ-JP:30634] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9882/2025] provisions of law under the NDPS Act before effecting search and seizure. He also submits that both the cases registered against the appellant were disposed of and there is no other case pending against him. The investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more re- quired by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He fur- ther assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicants-accused will be avail- able for such investigation. He also submitted that the inves- tigation will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody. 4 Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prose- cutor. 5 Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record 6 As per police, when appellant-accused was intercepted then 2.60 Kgs Ganja was recovered from his conscious possession and there is no other criminal antecedents against the appel- lant-accused. The recovered quantity is less than commercial quantity. 7 Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. [2025:RJ-JP:30634] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9882/2025] 8 Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of appli- cants-accused Kaluram @ Kamal Singh S/o Sarjeet Singh, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN ),J MONU /303