Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26653 (GAU)

JANAM HAQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/3936/2025 · 2025-12-04

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010152392025 2025:GAU-AS:16816 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3936/2025 JANAM HAQUE S/O- RABIUL HAQUE, VILL. AND P.O. LACHIMA, P.S. MUKALMUA, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM, PIPN- 781312. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, ELEMENTARY, ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE ASSAM STATE SCHOOL EDUCATION BOARD (ASSEB) DIVISION-I TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRPERSON/ SECRETARY BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21. 3:THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS THE ASSAM STATE SCHOOL EDUCATION BOARD (ASSEB) DIVISION-I BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21. 4:NURUL HUDHA ENGLISH TEACHER EXAMINER UNDER THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS THE ASSAM STATE SCHOOL EDUCATION BOARD (ASSEB) DIVISION-I BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-21 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A MANNAF, MD A S ALI Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, A S S E B,MR. T C CHUTIA, SC, A S S E B BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 05-12-2025 Heard Mr. A. Mannaf, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. K. Roy, learned Standing Counsel for ASSEB. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the Assam State School Education Board (ASSEB) to re-check and re-evaluate his answer script of English subject of the HSLC Examination, 2025. 3. The respondent ASSEB, by filing an affidavit, has categorically stated that in response to the claim of the petitioner, a subject expert was appointed to re- examine the answers to the specific questions for which rechecking and re- evaluation had been sought in the English subject of the petitioner, who had appeared in and passed the HSLC Examination, 2025. Upon such re-examination by the expert, it has been found that the petitioner would be entitled to an additional 5 (five) marks in the English subject. In view of the above, appropriate and consequential action to be followed. 4. Having considered that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondent ASSEB that, upon re-examination, the petitioner is entitled to an additional 5 (five) marks in the English subject, I am of the view that no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. Accordingly, the same deserves to be closed. Page No.# 3/3 5. The writ petition stands closed and disposed of, accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant