Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26645 (ALL)

VINAY KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/7954/2025 · 2025-03-10

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35311 Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 7954 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinay Kumar And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Short counter affidavit along with Vakalatnama filed by Sri Deepak Upadhyay, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Subham Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Deepak Upadhyay, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Uday Bhan, learned AGA for the State. 3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 29.10.2021 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya as well as entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.400 of 2019, under Sections 323 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Achalda, District Auraiya, pending in the court of Civil Judge(J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as counsel for the opposite party no.2 jointly submitted that dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature and both the parties have settled their dispute amicably and entered into compromise. The aforesaid compromise dated 14.02.2025 is reduced in written compromise and also annexed at page 27 of the affidavit. It has been requested that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of aforesaid compromise. 5. Though this fact is not disputed by the counsel for the opposite party no.2 but learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection that the aforesaid proceeding cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise. The aforesaid compromise should be verified by the court below before quashing the impugned proceeding. 6. In view of the above, the applicant is directed to file original deed of the compromise before the court below within a period of 15 days from today. On filing of such compromise, the court below will verify the same within a period of two months after summoning the parties. It is further directed that the court below may quash the impugned proceeding on the basis of verified compromise. 8. For a period of two months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. However, the parties are at liberty to file a fresh application under Section 528 BNSS to quash the impugned proceeding on the basis of verified copy of compromise, if need arises. 10. With the aforesaid direction, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 A.Kr. Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad