APHC010376702019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. Pavuluri Satyanarayana,, s/o late Venkayya, aged 60 years, Agriculture, Kondayapalem village, Ballikurava Mandalam, Prakasham District. 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Prl Secretary, Panchayatraj Department, Secreteriat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Ballikurava mandal, Prakasham district. 3. The Deputy Executive Engineer, PRI, Addanki sub division, Prrakasham district. 4. The Assistant Executive Engineer, PRI Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasham district. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 18079 OF 2019 1. Pavuluri Satyanarayana,, s/o late Venkayya, aged 60 years, Agriculture, Kondayapalem village, Ballikurava Mandalam, ...Petitioner AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Prl anchayatraj Department, Secreteriat, Velagapudi, 2. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Ballikurava mandal, Prakasham district. 3. The Deputy Executive Engineer, PRI, Addanki sub division, ecutive Engineer, PRI Ballikurava Mandal, THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU 1. Pavuluri Satyanarayana,, s/o late Venkayya, aged 60 years, Agriculture, Kondayapalem village, Ballikurava Mandalam, ...Petitioner 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Prl anchayatraj Department, Secreteriat, Velagapudi, 2. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Ballikurava 3. The Deputy Executive Engineer, PRI, Addanki sub division, ecutive Engineer, PRI Ballikurava Mandal, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass order or orders more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering the representation dated 17-04-2019 for the payment of bills for the works completed as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 17-04-2019 for the payment of bills for the works completed Counsel for the Petitioner: HANUMANTHA RAO VELLALACHERVU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 18079 OF 2019 Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the claim of the writ petitioner has already been complied with. Hence, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 11.08.2025 KKV 145 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.18079 of 2019 11.08.2025 KKV