SMT.PARKASHVATI MEHRA v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
CWP/3212/2000 · 2025-07-03
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26632 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26632 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
205
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-3212-2000 Date of Decision: 03.07.2025
Smt. Parkashvati Mehra
…Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and Others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Arvind K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking reimbursement of medical expenses incurred by him on the treatment of his wife.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that first bill of Rs.4,30,520.94/- has already been cleared, however, respondent has not cleared second bill of Rs.2,96,000/-.
3.
The petitioner has already been paid amount as claimed in the petition. The petitioner, who is LR of petitioner namely R.P. Mehra, may file representation to respondent with respect to her claim of Rs.2,96,000/- which would be considered by respondent No.4 in accordance with law.
4.
In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 03.07.2025 Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.04 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document