Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26627 (AP)

K.Nagendramma v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/34230/2013 · 2025-07-29

T C D Sekhar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010376012013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 34230/2013 Between: 1. K.NAGENDRAMMA, W/O. TIPPA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. TEMPORARY FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER R/O. NAGIREDDYPALLY VILLAGE OF ANANTAPURAM MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BLDGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ( CIVIL SUPPLIES WING ) ANANTAPURAM , ANANTAPURAM DIST. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM AM DIST. 4. THE THASILDAR, ANANTAPURAM MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. P KESAVA REDDY, S/O. LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YRS, R/O. NAGIREDDYPALLY VILLAGE, OF ANANTAPURAM MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the proceedings / order of the 2nd respondent passed in D.Dis.No.K /13 /ATP / 643 /2005 Dt. 31.7.2013 wherein and whereby restoring the authorization of the 5th respondent, of Nagireddypally Village of Anantapuram Mandal, Anantapuram District as if irregularities committed to the In charge Shop of Somaladoddi, but not to the Nagireddypally Village of Anantapuram Mandal and District, amounts to erroneous, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India besides being the provisions contemplated under 2 A P State Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2008, and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same by allowing the writ petition in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 42606 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of the 2nd respondent passed in D Dis No. K /13 /ATP / 643 /2005 Dt. 31.7.2013 by in continuing the petitioner as temporary Fair Price Shop dealer of Nagireddypally Village, of Anantapuramu Mandal and District pending disposal of WP. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO. 34230 of 2013 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date : 30.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Writ Petition No:34230 of 2013 Date : 30.07.2025 SPP