Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26626 (GAU)

AARAMANI BEGUM AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.

WP(C)/8286/2019 · 2025-12-09

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010272872019 2025:GAU-AS:17056 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8286/2019 AARAMANI BEGUM AND 2 ORS. W/O. LT. HACHANUDDIN AHMED, VILL. BARAGAON, P.O. HIHDIA, P.S. HAIHATA CHARALI SUB-DIVISION- KAMRUP DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM. 2: LINA BEGUM D/O. LT. HACHANUDDIN AHMED VILL. BARAGAON P.O. HIHDIA P.S. HAIHATA CHARALI SUB-DIVISION- KAMRUP DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 3: BULBUL HUSSAIN S/O. LT. HACHANUDDIN AHMED VILL. BARAGAON P.O. HIHDIA P.S. HAIHATA CHARALI SUB-DIVISION- KAMRUP DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPTT., DISPUR. 2:THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPTT. DISPUR 3:THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY OFFICER KAMRUP DIST. KAMRUP Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM. 4:THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DIVISIONAL ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPTT. RANGIA DIST. KAMRUP. 5:THE DIRCTOR OF PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY. KAMRUP ASSAM. 6:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-28 KAMRUP. 7:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. ASSAM DISPUR GHY.-06. 8:MUSSTT. JAHURA BEGUM W/O. LT. HASANUDDIN AHMED VILL. BARAGAON P.O. BIHDIA P.S. BAIHAT CHARALI SUB-DIVISION KAMRUP DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K DAS, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. B SAIKIA,A R AHMED,MR H ZAMAN,SC, FINANCE,ASSTT.S.G.I. Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 10.12.2025 Heard Mr. P. Medhi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B. K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners, who submits that he has received an instruction from the petitioner that the grievance raised in this writ petition has been redressed. Therefore, he prays for disposal of the writ petition as being infructuous. Mr. T. C. Chutia, learned State Counsel for respondent No. 5, and Ms. B. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent No. 8, are present. In view of above, writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant