[2025:RJ-JP:11925] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13168/2023 1. Laxman Singh S/o Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o A-5 Jhalana Pyau Jhalana Gram, Calgiri Hospital Road, Malviya Nagar District Jaipur, (Rajasthan). 2. Deepak Kumar Vashishtha S/o Shri Mukut Bihari, R/o D- 258 Purohit Pada, Brahmpuri, Jaipur. 3. Bhoop Singh S/o Shri Budha Ram, R/o Plot No. 55 Nanag Puri, Nidriyo Ki Dhani, Baidh Ji Ka Chauraha, Niwaru Road Jaipur. 4. Shriram Meena S/o Late Shri Madan Lal, R/o Ward No. 5 Neem Ka Thana Pathwari Ka Mohalla District Neem Ka Thana. 5. Mushtaq Ahmed S/o Late Shri Roshan Khan, R/o Sanjay Nagar -B House No 406, Jhotwara, Jaipur. 6. Bheem Sen Chodhary S/o Shri Bhoma Ram Choudhary, R/o Hathnoda, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Of Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Police Commissioner, Police Commissionerate Head- Quater, Government Hostel Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Director Treasury And Accounts, Department, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta-AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/03/2025 1 Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this petition has already been decided by [2025:RJ-JP:11925] (2 of 3) [CW-13168/2023] this Court while deciding a bunch of writ petitions with the lead case of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 21/2020). Counsels submit that instant petition be also disposed of in the light of similar directions. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 3. The controversy involved in this petition is no more res integra and the same has been decided by this Court in a batch of writ petitions with the lead case of Vijay Singh (Supra) with the following observations and directions:- “41. Hence, looking to the binding effect of above judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of The Director (Admn. and H.R.) KPTCL and Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani and Ors. and All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India, it is held that the petitioners would be entitled to get the benefits of increment falling due on 1st July on account of their conduct for the requisite length of time i.e. one year. The petitioners would be entitled to get notional payment on 1st July, notwithstanding their superannuation on 30th June. 42. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners afresh in the light of the observations made hereinabove and thereafter grant notional increment to the petitioners. The petitioners’ pension would consequently be refixed. The appropriate orders be issued and the arrears of pension be paid to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.” [2025:RJ-JP:11925] (3 of 3) [CW-13168/2023] 4. Instant petition stands disposed of in the light of the same directions as issued in the case of Vijay Singh (Supra). 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/402