Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26621 (RAJ)

RAMESH SAINI S/O PAPPU SAINI v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WMAP/341/2025 · 2025-08-13

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31448] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 341/2025 Ramesh Saini S/o Pappu Saini, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Machda, Ganesh Nagar-4, Bangar Road, Jaipur (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Secretary Jaipur Development Authority, Indira Circle, Jln Marg, Jaipur 2. Deputy Commissioner, Zone-6, Jaipur Development Authority, Indira Circle, Jln Marg, Jaipur-302004 3. Enforcement Officer, Zone-6, Jaipur Development Authority, Indira Circle, Jln Marg, Jaipur-302004 4. Suresh Saini S/o Galkha Ram Saini, Resident Of Village Machda, Ganesh-4, Bangar Road, Jaipur (Raj). 5. Shankar Saini S/o Galkha Ram Saini, Resident Of Village Machda, Ganesh Nagar-4, Bangar Road, Jaipur (Raj). 6. Kishan Saini S/o Galkha Ram Saini, Resident Of Village Machda, Ganesh Nagar-4, Bangar Road, Jaipur (Raj). 7. Sitaram Saini S/o Galkha Ram Saini, Resident Of Village Machda, Ganesh Nagar-4, Bangar Road, Jaipur, (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 13/08/2025 The instant application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 11.07.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 11.07.2025, while disposing of the writ petition, the respondent no.2 was directed to conduct inquiry with regard to encroachment on the government land and conclude the same within a period [2025:RJ-JP:31448] (2 of 2) [WMAP-341/2025] three months whereas the case of the petitioner is not encroachment on the government land. The main thrust of the petitioner is to stop illegal commercial activities in front of the house of the petitioner. He thus, seeks suitable modification in the order dated 11.07.2025. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material available on record, it is deemed appropriate to accept the instant application for modification of the order dated 11.07.2025. Accordingly, in place of directions given to the respondent no.2 to conduct inquiry with regard to encroachment on the government land, the respondent no.2 is directed to conduct inquiry for illegal commercial activities in front of the house of the petitioner. Hence, the order dated 11.07.2025 is modified and it is hereby directed that the petitioner shall submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 with regard to commercial activities in front of the house of the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. If any representation is filed, the respondent no.2 is directed to initiate inquiry with regard to commercial activities in front of the petitioner’s house and conclude the same within a period of three months from the date of submission of the representation after giving opportunity to all the interested persons. This order shall be treated part and parcel of the order dated 11.07.2025. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /61