- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21606 WP No. 14192 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 14192 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PRADEEP P. SHAH, S/O PUJALAL SHAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. SRI. SHARAD P. SHAH, S/O PUJALAL SHAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.16, 3RD FLOOR, RAJA BUILDING NARANG CHAMBER, N.R ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.R. RAJAGOPAL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. THILAKRAJ S.V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. VENUGOPAL A.M, S/O MUNIRAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.46, NEAR CHURCH, ADIGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. 2. SRI. SHIVASHANKAR, S/O VENKATASWAMY, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21606 WP No. 14192 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ADIGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. 3. SRI. DINESH R. SHAH, S/O LATE RATHILAL D SHAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.16, 3RD FLOOR, RAJA BUILDING NARANG CHAMBER, N.R ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. 4. SRI. J ANTHONY RAJ S/O LATE JOSEPH 5. SRI. THOMAS S/O LATE JOSEPH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS DEFENDANT NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT KALENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, S.O.S POST, BEGUR HOBLI, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 076. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, JUNIOR DIVISION, AND BENGALURU RURAL IN O.S NO. 582/2025 AND QUASH OR SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, JUNIOR DIVISION, AND - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21606 WP No. 14192 of 2025 BENGALURU RURAL DATED 24.04.2025 ON I.A NO.1/2025 IN O.S NO.582/2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-U AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The learned Senior Counsel Shri. M.R.Rajagopal appearing for the petitioners, in all fairness, would submit the petition would not survive for any further consideration in the light of the fact that the first Appellate Court has not extended the interim order on the ground that the present petition is pending consideration. 2. In the light of the said submission, the petition is disposed as having rendered infructuous. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69 CT: BHK