Page No.1 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 2025:CGHC:37564 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Appeal No. 1135 of 2018 [Arising out of judgment dated 15.02.2018, passed in Special Criminal Case No.198 of 2017 (State of Chhattisgarh v. Premshankar Sen) by the Additional Sessions Judge (FCT), Dhamtari (CG)] XYZ [This appeal has been filed by the father of a rape survivor/victim and, therefore, in light of Section 228-A of the Indian Penal Code and in view of decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Nipun Saxena and another v. Union of India and others 1 , the name of the appellant is not disclosed in this judgment.] ... Appellant Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, through- District Magistrate, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Premshankar Sen, S/o Late Mahendra Sen, R/o- Village- Kuliya, Police Station and Tahsil- Gurur, Revenue District- Balod, Civil District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant : Mr. Vineet Kumar Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anand Kesharwani, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. HAPS Bhatia, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Judgment on Board (31.07.2025) 1 (2019) 2 SCC 703 SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Page No.2 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 Sanjay K. Agrawal, J (1) This criminal appeal filed under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the “CrPC”) is at the instance of the father of an unfortunate rape survivor/victim, who has been subjected to aggravated penetrative sexual assault by the accused (respondent No.02 herein) and, for which, the accused has been convicted and sentenced for offence under Section 363, 307 & 376 of IPC read with Section 06 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for brevity the “POCSO Act”) by same impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.02.2018, passed in Special Criminal Case No.198 of 2017 (State of Chhattisgarh v. Premshankar Sen) by the Additional Sessions Judge (FCT), Dhamtari (CG). Factual Backdrop: (2) The appeal preferred by the accused (respondent No.02 herein) being Criminal Appeal No.1698 of 2019 (Prem Shankar Sen v. State of Chhattisgarh) questioning the aforesaid judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.02.2018 has been considered by us separately today itself vide judgment dated 31.07.2025, whereby we have dismissed the appeal of the accused and affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.02.2018 passed by the learned trial Court. However, while passing the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence Page No.3 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 dated 15.02.2018, the learned trial Court has awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- to the unfortunate rape victim under Section 357-A of CrPC, which has been questioned by the appellant in this appeal by stating that the compensation awarded is not just and proper and same ought to have been awarded reasonably under Section 357 (3) of IPC read with Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act, 2012. Submissions of the parties: (3) Mr. Vineet Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the compensation awarded to the unfortunate rape victim is on the lower side and it ought to have been enhanced in light of the Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes, 2018 promulgated by the State of Chhattisgarh w.e.f. 02.10.2018. Learned counsel vehemently argued that the aforesaid Scheme of 2018 would squarely applicable in the present case, as the incident in question occurred on 21.06.2017 whereby offences under Sections 363, 307 & 376 of IPC read with Section 06 of the POCSO Act were charged against the accused. Hence, this appeal may be allowed. (4) On the other hand, Mr. HAPS Bhatia, learned State counsel would submits that the learned trial Court is absolutely justified in awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- to the victim under the facts and circumstances of the present case and, it need Page No.4 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 not to be enhanced anymore. Thus, this appeal is liable to be dismissed. (5) We have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their rival submissions made herein-above and went through the records with utmost circumspection. Discussion and analysis: (6) In order to answer the plea raised at the bar, it would be first appropriate to notice Section 357 of CrPC, which reads as under: “357. Order to pay compensation.—(1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied— (a) in defraying the expenses properly incurred in the prosecution; (b) in the payment to any person of compensation for any loss or injury caused by the offence, when compensation is, in the opinion of the Court, recoverable by such person in a Civil Court; (c) when any person is convicted of any offence for having caused the death of another person or of having abetted the commission of such an offence, in paying compensation to the persons who are, under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (13 of 1855 ), entitled to recover damages from the person sentenced for the loss resulting to them from such death; (d) when any person is convicted of any offence which includes theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be Page No.5 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 stolen, in compensating any bona fide purchaser of such property for the loss of the same if such property is restored to the possession of the person entitled thereto (2) If the fine is imposed in a case which is subject to appeal, no such payment shall be made before the period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal be presented, before the decision of the appeal. (3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced. (4) An order under this section may also be made by an Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of Session when exercising its powers of revision. (5) At the time of awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the Court shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation under this section.” (7) The Supreme Court in the matter of Maru Ram v. Union of India 2 held that while social responsibility of the criminal to restore the loss or heal the injury is part of the punitive exercise, the length of the prison term in no reparation to the cripped or bereaved and is futility compounded with cruelty. Section 357 of CrPC provides power to award compensation to victims of the offence out of the sentence of fine imposed on accused. It empowers the court to award compensation to victims while passing judgment 2 (1981) 1 SCC 107 Page No.6 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 of conviction. In addition to conviction, the court may order the accused to pay some amount by way of compensation to the victim who has suffered by the action of accused. (8) Despite the above-stated clear provision and guidelines of the Supreme Court of grant of compensation to the victim at the time of conclusion of trial, the criminal courts were found reluctant to award compensation to the victims; noticing this apathy and inhibition, the Supreme Court in the matter of Hari Krishna and State of Haryana v. Sukhbir Singh3 recommended to all courts to exercise this power of granting compensation liberally under Section 357 of the Code so as to meet the ends of justice by observing as under: - “Section 357 of the Cr.P.C. is an important provision but Courts have seldom invoked it. This Section of law empowers the Court to award compensation while passing judgment of conviction. In addition to conviction, the Court may order the accused to pay some amount by way of compensation to the victim who has suffered by the action of the accused. This power to award compensation is not ancillary to other sentences but is in addition thereto. It is a measure of responding appropriately to crime as well as reconciling the victim with the offender. It is, to some extent, a constructive approach to crimes. It is indeed a step forward in our criminal justice system. We therefore recommend to all courts to exercise this power liberally so as to meet the ends of justice in a better way.” (9) The above-stated mandate / reminder of their Lordships of the 3 (1988) 4 SCC 551 Page No.7 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 Supreme Court qua the grant of compensation to the victim at the time of conclusion of trial, did not evince any interest in the criminal courts and apathy continued qua victims. In view of that situation, the Supreme Court in the matter of Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra4, held that it is the mandatory duty of Courts to apply its mind to the question of compensation in every criminal case, that too by recording reasons. It has been held as under in paragraph 66 of the report: - “66. To sum up: while the award or refusal of compensation in a particular case may be within the Court’s discretion, there exists a mandatory duty on the Court to apply its mind to the question in every criminal case. Application of mind to the question is best disclosed by recording reasons for awarding/refusing compensation. It is axiomatic that for any exercise involving application of mind, the Court ought to have the necessary material which it would evaluate to arrive at a fair and reasonable conclusion. It is also beyond dispute that the occasion to consider the question of award of compensation would logically arise only after the court records a conviction of the accused. Capacity of the accused to pay which constitutes an important aspect of any order under Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure would involve a certain enquiry albeit summary unless of course the facts as merging in the course of the trial are so clear that the court considers it unnecessary to do so. Such an enquiry can precede an order on sentence to enable the court to take a view, both on the question of sentence and compensation that it may in its wisdom decide to award to the victim or his/her family.” 4 (2013) 6 SCC 770 Page No.8 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 (10) Meanwhile, the Law Commission of India in its 154th Law Commission Report on the Code of Criminal Procedure made recommendation to insert Section 357A as Victim compensation scheme and consequently, accepting the said recommendation, Section 357A was inserted in the Code which reads as follows: - “357A. Victim compensation scheme.—(1) Every State Government in coordination with the Central Government shall prepare a scheme for providing funds for the purpose of compensation to the victim or his dependents who have suffered loss or injury as a result of the crime and who require rehabilitation. (2) Whenever a recommendation is made by the Court for compensation, the District Legal Service Authority or the State Legal Service Authority, as the case may be, shall decide the quantum of compensation to be awarded under the scheme referred to in sub-section (1). (3) If the trial Court, at the conclusion of the trial, is satisfied that the compensation awarded under section 357 is not adequate for such rehabilitation, or where the cases end in acquittal or discharge and the Victim has to be rehabilitated, it may make recommendation for compensation. (4) to (6) xxx xxx xxx” (11) This provision has been brought into the statute book i.e. the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Amending Act 5 of 2009 and the amendment has been brought into force with effect from 31-12- 2009. The object and purpose of the provision is to enable the Court to direct the State to pay compensation to the victim where the compensation under Section 357 was not adequate or where the Page No.9 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 cases ended in acquittal or discharge and the victim was required to be rehabilitated. The provision was incorporated on the recommendation of 154th Report of the Law Commission. It recognises compensation as one of the methods of protection of victims. {See Suresh and another v. State of Haryana 5 (supra).} (12) At this stage, it would be appropriate to notice Sections 357B and 357C of the Code which read as under: - “357B. Compensation to be in addition to fine under section 326A or section 376D of Indian Penal Code. —The compensation payable by the State Government under section 357A shall be in addition to the payment of fine to the victim under section 326A, 376AB, section 376D, 376DA and 376DB of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). 357C. Treatment of victims.—All hospitals, public or private, whether run by the Central Government, the State Government, local bodies or any other person, shall immediately, provide the first-aid or medical treatment, free of cost, to the victims of any offence covered under section 326A, 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, 376DB or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), and shall immediately inform the police of such incident.” (13) In Suresh (supra), their Lordships of the Supreme Court have clearly noticed that despite there being a clear provision in Section 357A of the Code, the award of compensation has not become a rule and interim compensation, though it is very important, is not being granted by the courts. It has been observed pertinently as under: - 5 (2015) 2 SCC 227 Page No.10 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 “15. We are informed that 25 out of 29 State Governments have notified victim compensation schemes. The schemes specify maximum limit of compensation and subject to maximum limit, the discretion to decide the quantum has been left with the State/ District Legal Authorities. It has been brought to our notice that even though almost a period of five years has expired since the enactment of Section 357- A, the award of compensation has not become a rule and interim compensation, which is very important, is not being granted by the courts. It has also been pointed out that the upper limit of compensation fixed by some of the States is arbitrarily low and is not in keeping with the object of the legislation. 16. We are of the view that it is the duty of the courts, on taking cognizance of a criminal offence, to ascertain whether there is tangible material to show commission of crime, whether the victim is identifiable and whether the victim of crime needs immediate financial relief. On being satisfied on an application or on its own motion, the court ought to direct grant of interim compensation, subject to final compensation being determined later. Such duty continues at every stage of a criminal case where compensation ought to be given and has not been given, irrespective of the application by the victim. At the stage of final hearing it is obligatory on the part of the court to advert to the provision and record a finding whether a case for grant of compensation has been made out and, if so, who is entitled to compensation and how much. Award of such compensation can be interim. Gravity of offence and need of victim are some of the guiding factors to be kept in mind, apart from such other factors as may be found relevant in the facts and circumstances of an individual case.” (14) In the matter of Bijoy alias Guddu Das v. State of West Bengal6, the Calcutta High Court while dealing with the provisions 6 2017 Cri. L.J. 3893 Page No.11 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 of the POCSO Act qua the compensation to the victim, in paragraph 39 of the report, held as under: - “39. The following directives are issued to the investigating agencies, prosecutors and the Special Courts so that the aforesaid provisions of law are followed in letter and spirit and fundamental right of dignity of a child victim and other basic human rights are preserved:- 1. to 8. xxx xxx xxx 9. The Special Court upon receipt of information as to commission of any offence under the Act by registration of FIR shall on his own or on the application of the victim make enquiry as to the immediate needs of the child for relief or rehabilitation and upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the State and other affected parties including the victim pass appropriate order for interim compensation and/or rehabilitation of the child. In conclusion of proceeding, whether the accused is convicted or not, or in cases where the accused has not been traced or had absconded, the Special Court being satisfied that the victim had suffered loss or injury due to commission of the offence shall award just and reasonable compensation in favour of the victim. The quantum of the compensation shall be fixed taking into consideration the loss and injury suffered by the victim and other related factors as laid down in Rule 7(3) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2012 and shall not be restricted to the minimum amounts prescribed in the Victim Compensation Fund. The interim/final compensation shall be paid either from the Victim Compensation Fund or any other special scheme/fund established under section 357-A of the Code or any other law for the time being in force through the State Legal Services Authorities or the District Services Authority in whose hands the Fund is entrusted. If the Court declines to pass Page No.12 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 interim or final compensation in the instant case it shall record its reasons for not doing so. The interim compensation, so paid, shall be adjusted with final compensation, if any, awarded by the Special Court in conclusion of trial in terms of section 33(8) of the Act. 10. xxx xxx xxx” (15) The judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Bijoy alias Guddu Das (supra) was not only approved by the Supreme Court in the matter of Nipun Saxena (supra), but their Lordships were pleased to make the said judgment a part of its judgment mandating all concerned to issue necessary direction in that behalf. It was held as under: - “45. The Calcutta High Court in Bijoy case4 has also given other directions to ensure that the provisions of the law are followed in letter and spirit, and the fundamental rights of a child victim and other basic human rights are protected. We are in agreement with all these directions. Though some of the issues dealt with in these directions do not strictly arise in this case, keeping in view the fact that we are dealing with the rights of children, we are annexing the directions issued by the Calcutta High Court as Annexure 1 to this judgment. We request all the Chairpersons and Members of all the Juvenile Justice Committee of all the High Courts in the country to go through the judgment of the Calcutta High Court and the directions issued therein and they may issue similar directions, keeping in view the particular needs of each High Court/State.” (16) The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 came to be enacted by the Parliament with effect from 14-11-2012 to protect children from offences of sexual assault, sexual Page No.13 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 harassment and pornography and provide for establishment of Special Courts for trial of such offences. Sub-section (8) of Section 33 of the POCSO Act and Rule 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2012 which also provide for compensation read as under: - Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act “33. Procedure and powers of Special Court.—(1) to (7) xxx xxx xxx (8) In appropriate cases, the Special Court may, in addition to the punishment, direct payment of such compensation as may be prescribed to the child for any physical or mental trauma caused to him or for immediate rehabilitation of such child. (9) xxx xxx xxx” Rule 7 of the POCSO Rules, 2012 (substituted by the POCSO Rules, 2020 with effect from 9-3-2020) Rule 9 of the pari materia POCSO Rules, 2020 “9. Compensation.—(1) The Special Court may, in appropriate cases, on its own or on an application filed by or on behalf of the child, pass an order for interim compensation to meet the immediate needs of the child for relief or rehabilitation at any stage after registration of the First Information Report. Such interim compensation paid to the child shall be adjusted against the final compensation, if any. (2) The Special Court may, on its own or on an application filed by or on behalf of the victim, recommend the award of compensation where the accused is convicted, or where the case ends in acquittal or discharge, or the accused is not traced or identified, and in the opinion of the Special Court the child has suffered loss or injury as a result of that offence. (3) Where the Special Court, under sub-section (8) of section 33 of the Act read with sub-sections (2) and (3) Page No.14 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 of section 357A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, makes a direction for the award of compensation to the victim, it shall take into account all relevant factors relating to the loss or injury caused to the victim, including the following:— (i) type of abuse, gravity of the offence and the severity of the mental or physical harm or injury suffered by the child; (ii) the expenditure incurred or likely to be incurred on his medical treatment for physical and/or mental health; (iii) loss of educational opportunity as a consequence of the offence, including absence from school due to mental trauma, bodily injury, medical treatment, investigation and trial of the offence, or any other reason; (iv) loss of employment as a result of the offence, including absence from place of employment due to mental trauma, bodily injury, medical treatment, investigation and trial of the offence, or any other reason; (v) the relationship of the child to the offender, if any; (vi) whether the abuse was a single isolated incidence or whether the abuse took place over a period of time; (vii) whether the child became pregnant as a result of the offence; (viii) whether the child contracted a sexually transmitted diseased (STD) as a result of the offence; (ix) whether the child contracted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as a result of the offence; (x) any disability suffered by the child as a result of the offence; (xi) financial condition of the child against whom the offence has been committed so as to determine his need for rehabilitation; (xii) any other factor that the Special Court may Page No.15 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 consider to be relevant. (4) The compensation awarded by the Special Court is to be paid by the State Government from the Victims Compensation Fund or other scheme or fund established by it for the purposes of compensating and rehabilitating victims under section 357A of the Code of Criminal Procedure or any other laws for the time being in force, or, where such fund or scheme does not exist, by the State Government. (5) The State Government shall pay the compensation ordered by the Special Court within 30 days of receipt of such order. (6) Nothing in these rules shall prevent a child or his parent or guardian or any other person in whom the child has trust and confidence from submitting an application for seeking relief under any other rules or scheme of the Central Government or State Government.” (17) A conjoint reading of sub-section (8) of Section 33 of the POCSO Act read with Rule 9 of the POCSO Rules, 2020 would show that the Special Judge is empowered to direct for payment of compensation to the victim / child for loss or pain which he / she has suffered. The quantum of compensation shall be calculated taking into consideration the loss or injury suffered by the victim and other related factors laid down in Rule 7(3) of the POCSO Rules, 2012 substituted by the POCSO Rules, 2020 and shall not be restricted to the minimum compensation amount as prescribed by the Victims Compensation Scheme by the State Government. It would also be clear that such compensation, interim or final, shall be paid either from the Victims Compensation Scheme or any other Page No.16 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 scheme or fund established under Section 357A of the Code. (18) In the State of Chhattisgarh with effect from 3-8-2011, the Chhattisgarh Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011 enacted under Section 357A of the Code was in force and the Schedule attached with the Scheme states as under: - Schedule S.No. Details of Loss or Injury Maximum Limit of Compensation 1. Loss of Life 1.00 Lac 2. Loss of limb or part of body resulting 80% or above handicap or serious injury due to Acid Attack 50,000 3. Loss of Limb or part of body resulting above 40% and below 80% handicapped 25,000 4. Rape of Minor 50,000 5. Rape 25,000 6. Rehabilitation 20,000 7. Loss of limb or part of body resulting below 40% handicap 10,000 8. Injury causing several mental agony to women and child victim in cases like human Trafficking 20,000 9. Simple loss or injury to child victim 10,000 (19) The Supreme Court in the matter of Nipun Saxena (supra), in paragraph 9, held on 5-9-2018 that till the Scheme is framed, the NALSA’s Compensation Scheme should function as a guideline to the Special Court for the award of compensation to victims of child sexual abuse under Rule 7 of the POCSO Rules of 2012. Page No.17 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 Paragraphs 2, 9, 10 and 11 to 15 of the report state as under: - “2. It has been brought to our notice that as far as children are concerned, no Scheme of this nature has been framed with regard to the victims of sexual abuse under the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “the POCSO Act”). 9. Keeping this hiatus in mind, we are of the opinion, after hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as learned Additional Solicitor General, that NALSA’s Compensation Scheme should function as a guideline to the Special Court for the award of compensation to victims of child sexual abuse under Rule 7 until the Rules are finalised by the Central Government. 10. The Special Judge will, of course, take the provisions of the POCSO Act into consideration as well as any circumstances that are special to the victim while passing an appropriate order. 11. We need not emphasise that the legislation is gender neutral and, therefore, the guidelines will be applicable to all children. 12. The Special Judge will also pass appropriate orders regarding actual physical payment of the compensation or the interim compensation so that it is not misused or misutilised and is actually available for the benefit of the child victim. If the Special Judge deems it appropriate, an order of depositing the amount in an interest-bearing account may be passed. 13. A copy of NALSA’s Compensation Scheme as well as a copy of this order should be sent by the Registry to the Registrar General of every High Court with a direction that the Registrar General will circulate them to all the District Judges concerned for circulation to the Special Judges and the State, District and Taluka Legal Services Committees. Page No.18 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 14. A copy of the Scheme and a copy of the order passed by this Court will also be sent by the Registry to all the Judicial Academies for information. 15. We also direct that the publicity should be given to the Scheme as well as the order passed by us on regular basis until the Rules are finalised by the Central Government. The learned Additional Solicitor General assures us that the needful will be done on a regular basis through all forms of media. Needless to say that the Scheme and the Guidelines will be operational from 2-10-2018.” (20) It would be appropriate to mention here that the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) setup a committee and finalised the Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes and submitted before the Supreme Court on 24-4-2018 and on 21-5-2018, the said Scheme was accepted by the Supreme Court and called as “the Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes”. In the said Scheme, minimum limit of compensation provided to rape victim is 4 lakhs and upper limit of compensation is 7 lakhs. ₹ ₹ The Explanation appended to the said Rules provides that Chapter will not apply to the minor victims under the POCSO Act, 2012 qua compensation, as compensation issues are to be dealt with by the Special Courts under Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Rule 7 of the POCSO Rules, 2012. Thereafter, pursuant to the direction of the Supreme Court in Nipun Saxena (supra) by order dated 5-9-2018 that “NALSA's Compensation Scheme for Women Page No.19 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 Victims/ Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes 2018” shall function as a guideline to the Special Court for the award of compensation to the victims of child sexual offence under Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 357A of the Code, the State of Chhattisgarh has framed a scheme known as the Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/ Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes, 2018 with effect from 2-10-2018. Explanation appended to the Scheme provides that in case of Minor Victims under POCSO, it would be applicable. The Schedule attached to the said Scheme provides that in case of rape, minimum limit of compensation would be 4 ₹ lakhs and upper limit of compensation would be 7 lakhs. Serial ₹ No.3 of the said Schedule reads as under: - SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO WOMEN VICTIM OF CRIMES S.No. Particulars of loss or injury Minimum Limit of Compensation Upper Limit of Compensation 3. Rape Rs. 4 Lakh Rs. 7 Lakh (21) Now, the question is, whether the unfortunate rape victim is entitled for compensation as per the Scheme of 2018 framed by the State Government which came into force with effect from 2nd October, 2018 as per the notification dated 4th February, 2019 by which date the Scheme has been bought into force or under the old scheme which was enforced with effect from 3-8-2011? Page No.20 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 (22) Reverting to the facts of the case in the light of the above- stated statutory provisions and in the light of the aforesaid principles of law laid down by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in the aforesaid judgments, it is quite vivid that since the victim was minor and the accused (respondent No.02 herein) has been convicted for offences under Sections 363, 307 & 376 of IPC read with Section 06 of the POCSO Act, the unfortunate rape victim and her family members were required to be rehabilitated to protect them. Consequently, recommendation ought to have been made by the learned trial Court to the DLSA or the SLSA under Section 357A(2) of the Code read with Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act and Rule 7 of the POCSO Rules, 2012, but that has not been done despite the clear cut mandate in that regard. Taking into consideration that the victim herein is an unfortunate rape survivor, that too minor and she has been sexually assaulted when the offence took place and she has suffered not only physically but mentally also, and considering the gravity of offence and that she is required to be rehabilitated and further taking into consideration the provisions contained in the NALSA’s Compensation Scheme of 2018 and also keeping in mind the provision enumerated in Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act read with Rule 7 of the POCSO Rules, 2012 / Rule 9 of the POCSO Rules, 2020 (w.e.f. 9-3-2020) and she has been traumatised heavily, the victim herein is entitled for total compensation of ₹ 7 lakhs under Scheme 2018 and not under Page No.21 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 Scheme of 2011. Apart from this, since the victim has been paid low compensation by the learned trial Court and she is required to come to this Court through her father (appellant) to ventilate her grievance seeking the remedy of appeal before this Court, she would also be entitled for interest from the date of passing of impugned judgment by the learned trial Court i.e. 15.02.2018 till the actual payment is made. Conclusion: (23) Accordingly, the direction of the learned trial Court for paying compensation to the victim to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- is hereby set aside and, instead thereof, it is held that the victim will be entitled for compensation of Rs.7 lakhs (Rupees Seven Lakhs only) from the State Government along with 6% interest from the date of impugned judgment i.e. 15.02.2018 till the date of actual payment. The District Magistrate, Dhamtari shall deposit the above-stated amount before the concerned trial Court within 30 days from today. The concerned trial Court shall disburse the said amount to the victim in accordance with the directions given by the Supreme Court in the matter of General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Mrs. Susamma Thomas and others7 (Para-17) read with Para-12 in Nipun Saxena (supra). It is needless to mention that if compensation to any extent, as per the direction of the learned trial Court, has already been paid to the 7 AIR 1994 SC 1631 Page No.22 of 22 IN CRA-11135-2018 victim, same shall be adjusted from Rs.7 lakh to be paid to the victim as per our direction. (24) Consequently, with aforesaid direction and modifications, this criminal appeal is allowed. (25) Let a certified copy of this judgment be sent to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and action. A copy of this judgment be also sent to District Magistrate, Dhamtari and also sent to the Secretary, DLSA, Dhamtari to ensure deposition of the amount of compensation in favour of the victim, as per the directions contained in this judgment, expeditiously. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge s@if