2025:HHC:11113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 1288 of 2024 Decided on: 25.04.2025 Ashni Kumar … Petitioner Versus The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation, Ltd and others … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Sheetal Kaul, Advocate. For the respondent : Mrs. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner apprised the Court that though the payment has been made to the petitioner in terms of the judgment passed by the Court, however, it was not made within the time schedule as was mentioned in the judgment and therefore, the petitioner was entitled to interest in terms of the judgment for delayed payment. Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that interest shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today. Her statement is taken on record and these proceedings are closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court for revival of this petition in case needful is not done within six weeks. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 25, 2025 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?