929 CA 558 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 558 OF 2025 IN SA/430/2000 PARVATABAI BAPUSHEB MODAK LRS PRAVIN PRABHAKAR JUNDARE VERSUS SHANTABAI PURSHOTTAM NAGARKAR L.RS. SURESH L.RS. SUSHILA CHANDRAKANT NAGARKAR AND OTHERS … Adv. V. S. Bedre, Advocate for Applicant Adv. Nimish More h/f Adv. D. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent no. 1C in S.A. Adv. P. P. Kothari, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 in Second Appeal … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2007 IN X-OBJST/1308/2001 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 430 OF 2000 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4067 OF 2000 IN SA/430/2000 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 559 OF 2025 IN SA/430/2000 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13271 OF 2015 IN SA/430/2000 … CORUM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2025 PER COURT : ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO 558 OF 2025: . The applicant/appellant is permitted to delete names of respondent Nos. 2 and 4 at her risk. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks. 929 CA 558 2025 ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 559 OF 2025: . In view of the fact that the proposed respondent No. 7 has purchased the suit property after filing of the present appeal. Permission is granted to implead the proposed respondent No. 7 as respondent No. 7 in the Second Appeal. 2. Issue notice to the respondent No. 7, returnable on 15.04.2025. The prayer for injunction will be considered after the notice is served on the respondent No. 7. Appellant is permitted to serve respondent by all permissible modes in addition to regular modes of service. [ROHIT W. JOSHI] JUDGE KS_Kamble/