Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010081032025 2025:GAU-AS:15588 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./144/2025 BAJAJ AUTO CREDIT LIMITED A NON-BANKING FINANCIAL COMPANY NBFC OPERATING ITS BUSINESS AS PER THE GUIDELINES OF RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BAJAJ AUTO COMPLEX,MUMBAI PUNE ROAD, AKURDI, PUNE-411035 AND ONE OF ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR,SHUBHAM SQUARE, AT N.H. 37, LOKHRA, OPPOSITE, SARUSAJAI STADIUM, GUWAHATI-781034, IN THE DISTRICT OF KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, THE PRESENT PETITION IS BEEN REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR. BHASKAR JYOTI GOSWAMI, SON OF DINESH CHANDRA GOSWAMI. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SMTI. MANDO NATH W/O HEMNATA NATH R/O DAKHIN BORDOL P.S.-RANGIA P.O.-BARDAL DIST.-KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781354 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G BORDOLOI, A BOTSULUM,N J DAIMARI,MS. J BURAGOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS G DEKA (R-2) Page No.# 2/2 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 18.11.2025 Heard Mr. G Bordolai, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. G Deka, learned counsel for the private respondents. By order dated 27.02.2025, a prayer for Zimma of the vehicle was rejected by the learned Court below, in view of the report of the I.O that the vehicle is required for investigation, which was in progress. It appears that the charge- sheet has already been submitted in the case and therefore, investigation is over and the reason earlier shown by the I.O no longer appears to be valid. Hence, the instant revision petition is disposed of, with an observation that the petitioner shall file a fresh application for Zimma of the of the vehicle in question, which shall be considered by the learned Court below, keeping in view the law laid down in this regard by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as by the High Court. Accordingly, the revision petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations. JUDGE Comparing Assistant