Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26604 (GAU)

SRI HEM KUMAR MILI v. SRI KOGEN ZEEMEY

I.A.(Crl.)/1180/2025 · 2025-11-24

Shamima Jahan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010239802025 2025:GAU-AS:16025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1180/2025 SRI HEM KUMAR MILI S/O- SRI BAPUDHAR MILI, R/O VILLAGE- PURANA JILAM, P.S.- JONAI, DISTRICT- DHEMAJI, ASSAM. VERSUS SRI KOGEN ZEEMEY S/O SRI ENCAR ZEEMEY, R/O VILLAGE PURANA JILAM, P.O. LEKU, P.S. JONAI, DISTRICT - DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN- 787060 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SAIKIA, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 25.11.2025 Heard Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. By this application, the applicant has prayed for impleading the informant as party respondent No. 2 in AB No. 2460/2025. Since the matter relates to an Page No.# 2/2 offence under the POCSO Act, the victim or her guardian or the support person has to be made party in the proceedings. As such, this impleading application is allowed. The applicant is directed to file an application with amended cause title impleading the informant as respondent No 2. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant