Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26602 (ALL)

PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/6915/2025 · 2025-03-06

Vikram D Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33301 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6915 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner praying for following reliefs:- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 14.11.2024 issued by Respondent No.4 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition). (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent No.2 & 4 to consider and decide the reply/representation of petitioner dated 21.11.2024 & 26.11.2024 (Annexure-7 & 8 respectively to the writ petition) within a stipulated period." It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that a notice has been issued to the petitioner calling for explanation with regard to the work undertaken by the petitioner as Gram Pradhan. The petitioner has already submitted his reply before the respondent authorities. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the reply of the petitioner may be consider and final order may be passed within a stipulated period. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the reply of the petitioner will be consider and final orders will be passed by respondent no.4 in a time bound manner. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the reply filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Bhaskar Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad