HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1768 of 2020 Court No. - 92 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. List has been revised. Learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State are present whereas none present for the opposite party nos. 2 to 4. 2. Sri Diwakar Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Om Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist states the present revision has been rendered infructuous, therefore, it may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. In view of the above statement, this revision is dismissed as infructuous. October 10, 2025 Rmk. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Om Narayan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Chawan Prakash,J.) Kaushal Dwivedi .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad