2025:JHHC:14172 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1338 of 2017 --------------- 1. M/s Spriha Steels Private Limited, a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its works at Tata Road, PO- Khijri, PS-Namkum, Town & District-Ranchi, through its one of the Director, Rajesh Kumar Bhartiya, S/o late Swaroop Bhartiya, R/o H.B. Road, PO-Kokar, PS-Sadar, District-Ranchi 2. Rajesh Kumar Bhartiya, son of late Ram Swaroop Bhartiya resident of H.B. Road, PO-Kokar, PS-Sadar, Town & District-Ranchi …..........Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, 2. The Chaiman, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, now JUVNL, Engineer’s Building, H.E.C Township, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi through the Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Ranchi, Office at Kusai Colony, Doranda, PO & PS-Doranda, District- Ranchi. ...... Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. Sakaldeo Singh, Adv. (through VC) For the OPs : Mr. Priya Shrestha, Spl.PP ------------ Order No.19/Dated: 9th May, 2025 1. The instant petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C is directed against the order dated 23.08.2017 passed by the learned Special Judge, ACB, Ranchi in connection with Vigilance PS Case No. 30 of 1999 (Special Case No.7 of 1999) instituted for the offence under sections 120- B, 201, 353, 379, 467, 468, 471 and section 420 of the IPC, Section 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 whereby and whereunder, the application filed by the petitioner seeking discharge has been rejected. 2. At the outset, Mr. Sakaldeo Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioners who appears through virtual mode, has submitted that in the present case the petitioner has been acquitted by the learned trial Court and, as such, the present criminal revision petition has become infructuous. 3. Such submission has been made in presence of the learned State counsel, who has raised no objection. 2025:JHHC:14172 2 4. In view of the above, the present criminal revision petition has been rendered infructuous and disposed of as such. 5. Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) sudhir