[2025:RJ-JP:29975] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11805/2025 Santosh Saini W/o Shri Narayan Saini, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 66B, Sms Colony, Block B, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Development Authority, Indira Circle, Jln Marg Jaipur Through Secretary ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. HC Ganeshia, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 05/08/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this petition aggrieved by order dated 26.03.2025 passed by Presiding Officer, Appellate Tribunal, JDA in Appeal Misc. Application No.710/2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected without following the due procedure and creating a hostile discrimination against the petitioner, nevertheless, directions for demolition of construction upon the property in question has been given. 3. Perused the impugned order dated 26.03.2025 and the relevant portion of said judgment is here as under:- "tfoizk }kjk tokc izLrqr dj ;g tkfgj fd;k fd tksu 5 dh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj iz'uxr Hkw[k.M jksM {ks= esa gSA vr% fu;ekuqlkj uksfVl tkjh fd;k x;k gSA [2025:RJ-JP:29975] (2 of 3) [CW-11805/2025] vihykFkkZ;k dh vksj ls gFkjksbZx<+h x`g fuekZ.k lgdkjh lfefr }kjk Hkw[k.M la0 66ch ds vkoaVu i= fnukafdr 18-11-2017 dh izfr izLrqr dh o lkFk gh lkbZV Iyku Hkh izLrqr fd;k] iz'uxr fuekZ.k ds QksVksxzkQ Hkh izLrqr fd;s gSA blds vfrfjDr iz'uxr ;kstuk ,l-,e-,l- dkWyksuh CykWd&ch dk uD'kk Hkh izLrqr gqvk gSA bl vf/kdj.k esa jsQjsal ;kfpdk la0 309 cmuoku dqeqn lDlsuk cuke tfoizk o vU; yafcr gS ftlesa Hkh mDr ;kstuk dk uD'kk izLrqr gqvk gS] ftl ij yxh gqbZ lhy ds voyksdu ls ;g tkfgj gksrk gS fd ;g lwpuk] lwpuk ds vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e ds rgr yksd lwpuk vf/kdkjh] tfoizk }kjk tkjh fd;k x;k gSA gLrxr i=koyh esa tks ekufp= yxk gqvk gS ;g ekufp= vihykFkhZ ds ikl fdl izdkj ls vk;k gS] ;g Li"V ugha gSA jsQjsal ;kfpdk la0 309@2023 esa izLrqr ekufp= ds voyksdu ls ;g tkfgj gksrk gS fd Hkw[k.M la0 66 ch l`ftr ugha gS vkSj og lMd {ks= esa gS] blds vfrfjDr Loa; vihykFkhZ;k }kjk ;g tkfgj fd;k x;k gS fd ;g ;sktuk xSjvuqeksfnr gSA xSjvuqeksfnr ;kstuk esa fd;k x;k laiw.kZ fuekZ.k tfoizk vf/kfu;e] 1982 dh /kkjk 17 ds ifjizs{; esa voS/k gSA mijksDr leLr foospukuqlkj vihykFkhZ;k ;g lkfcr djus esa lQy ugha jgh gS fd iz'uxr Hkw[k.M lMd {ks= esa ugha gS] oju~ jsQjsal ;kfpdk la0 309@2023 esa izLrqr ekufp= ls ;g Li"V gS fd iz'uxr ;kstuk ,l-,e-,l- dkWyksuh] ch&CykWd esa Hkw[k.M la0 66 ch l`ftr ugha gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa tfoizk }kjk fn;s x;s vihyk/khu uksfVl esa dksbZ voS/krk] fof/kd =qfV vFkok vfu;ferrk ugha gSA vr% vihy fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA" 4. On perusal of the same, it is reflected that it is an admitted fact that SMS Colony, Block B is an un-approved Colony by the JDA. It is also noted that the plot in question is falling in the limbs of the road. The reliance which is placed by counsel is an RTI report and is not applicable as it is not a specific document. 5. JDA has properly appreciated the merits and demerits of the matter and has not committed any error while dismissing the [2025:RJ-JP:29975] (3 of 3) [CW-11805/2025] appeal preferred by the petitioner and this Court has considered the same. Hence, no interference is called for in the present petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. 6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /21