IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16242 of 2024 Decided on: 10th January, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hem Raj …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the legal issue involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioner has filed a representation dated 10.11.2024 (Annexure P-6) for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition, but till date the same has not been adjudicated upon; Petitioner would be 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 satisfied in case competent authority is directed to decide the representation in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 10.11.2024 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 10, 2025 Judge Mukesh