'.T APHC010376802a25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20347 OF 2025 Between: 1. Katukota Suseela, W/o. Subhash Chandra Bose, aged about 53 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. 2. Katukota Prameeta, D/o. Shankar Naidu, aged about 50 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. 3. Kampa Devi, D/o. Venkata Ramana, aged about 30 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati District.f 4. Gunisetti Vanish, W/o. G. Venkateswarlu Aged about 52 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. 5. Neelakantam Devi, W/o. N. Sudhakar, aged about 45 years, R/o. Plo.t.No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12. Pitchifeddy Thopu Naidupeta, Tirupati District. 6. Neelakantam Madhavi, W/o. K. Prabhu, aged about 31 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. 'T 7. Prasadi Penchalamma, W/o. Seenaiah, aged about 37 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu Naidupeta, Tirupati District 8. Nagisetty China Guravamma, D/o. N. Guravaiah aged about 30 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. 9. Lokku Bhaskar, S/o. Lokku Ramachandraiah aged about 53 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati District. 10. Dudekula Hussaini, S/o. Usheni, aged about 53 years, R/o. Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12, Pitchireddy Thopu Naidupeta, Tirupati District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State Bank of India, Manubolu Branch, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District Presently Migrated to SARB, Vijayawada, Rep by its Authorised Officer/Divisional Manager, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. The Station House Officer, Naidupeta Police Station, Naidupeta, SPSR Nellore District. 3. Smt. Karpuram Sarojanamma, W/o Karpuram Buseiah, R/o. D.No. 6- 12-667, Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta Town, SPSR Nellore District. 4. M/s Gayathri Exotic Products, Rep by its Prop. Sri Muppala Harish S/o. Muppala Kotesara Rao, Tippagunta palem Village, Chillakur Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in taking steps to evict the petitioners forcibly from the building situated in Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12 of Pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta pursuant to the order passed in CrI. M.P. No. 53 of 2025 dated. 06.03.2025 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate Judge, Nellore without fallowing due process of law as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to take any coercive steps to evict the petitioners from the above said premises without fallowing due process of law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to take any coercive steps to evict the petitioners from the building situated in Plot No. 145, Ward No. 6, Block No. 12 of pitchireddy Thopu, Naidupeta pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY (SC FOR SBI) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4: — The Court made the following order: Bench Sr.No:-19 [3483] APHC010376802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20347 of 2025 ...Petitioners Katukota Suseela and others Vs. ...Respondents The State Bank of India and others ********** Advocate for Petitioners Mr. P Ganga Rami Reddy Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): GP for Home for R.2. CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 5*^ August, 2025 PC : In view of the availability of an equally efficacious alternative remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and considering the ratio of the judgments of the Apex Court in Radha Kristian Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh [(2021) 6 SCC 771] and United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon [(2010) 8 SCC 110], we do not find it a fit case to invoke our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, One CC to Sri P Ganga Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri S Satyanarayana Moorthy, Advocate [OPUC] Two ccs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. TF HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 20347 OF 2025 2 2 AUG 2025 '''■Ssseais 3C m o Co Sectioi^^ DISMISSING THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS