Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26571 (GAU)

JITEN BASKE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/1362/2025 · 2025-12-17

Michael Zothankhuma, N Unni Krishnan Nair

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010246712025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1362/2025 JITEN BASKE S/O LATE LIPAM BASKE, RESIDENT OF NO. 2RONGABANANI GAON, P.S.TINGKHONG, DISTRICT DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY PP, ASSAM 2:SMT. NUNI URANG W/O LATE RAJEN URANG A R/O VILL. NO. 1 SUKANI GAON TINGKHONG DIBRUGARH ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. L DEVI, LEGAL AID COUNSEL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 JITEN BASKE S/O LATELIPAM BASKE RESIDENT OF NO. 2RONGABANANI GAON P.S.TINGKHONG DIBRUGARH ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 REP BY PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : LOVELY DEVI Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 18/12/2025 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. L. Devi, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 115 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under section 302 IPC. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Senior counsel and APP, Assam, submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties and considering the reasons for delay, the delay of 115 days is condoned. Registry to list the appeal. IA stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant