IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (121) Rajesh Kumar and Ors. State of Haryana and Ors. CORAM: Present: LISA GILL, J. (Oral) 1. passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby CWP No.12436 of 2021 filed by the present appellant was disposed of alo being CWP No.11142 of 2021. LPA No.518 of 2025, wh learned Single Bench has correctly held that benefit of one increment at initial rate is not admissible to those graduate clerks (as the appellants) who have received benefit of revised p 2. distinction which 3. without any order as to cost. March 27, 2025. manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rajesh Kumar and Ors. Versus State of Haryana and Ors. HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK **** Mr. Satya Vir Singh Yadav, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. LISA GILL, J. (Oral) Prayer in this appeal is for setting aside judgment dated passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby CWP No.12436 of 2021 filed by the present appellant was disposed of alongwith ten other writ petitions, t being CWP No.11142 of 2021. Writ petitioners in CWP No.11142 of 2021 518 of 2025, which was dismissed on 19.02.2025 while concluding that learned Single Bench has correctly held that benefit of one increment at initial rate is not admissible to those graduate clerks (as the appellants) who have received benefit of revised pay scale of Rs.4,000 Learned counsel for appellant is unable to point out any point of distinction which calls for a different dispensation in the present appeal. In the given facts and circumstances, this appeal is also dismissed any order as to cost. March 27, 2025. Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-925-2025 Date of Decision:-27.03.2025 ……Appellants ……Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Satya Vir Singh Yadav, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Prayer in this appeal is for setting aside judgment dated 14.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby CWP No.12436 of 2021 filed by the ngwith ten other writ petitions, the lead case ioners in CWP No.11142 of 2021 filed ich was dismissed on 19.02.2025 while concluding that learned Single Bench has correctly held that benefit of one increment at initial rate is not admissible to those graduate clerks (as the appellants) who have ay scale of Rs.4,000-6000. Learned counsel for appellant is unable to point out any point of different dispensation in the present appeal. the given facts and circumstances, this appeal is also dismissed (LISA GILL) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 2025 5 ……Appellants ……Respondents 14.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby CWP No.12436 of 2021 filed by the he lead case filed ich was dismissed on 19.02.2025 while concluding that learned Single Bench has correctly held that benefit of one increment at initial rate is not admissible to those graduate clerks (as the appellants) who have Learned counsel for appellant is unable to point out any point of the given facts and circumstances, this appeal is also dismissed Manju 2025.04.01 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document