[2025:RJ-JP:32303] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7766/2025 Naresh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Mahadev Prasad, Aged About 56 Years, Resident O Village Dhigawada, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, At Present Tenant House Owner Shri Ajeet Singh Shekhawat, House No. 23A, Ganesh Nagar-9th Gram Hathoj, Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9898/2025 Narendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Babulal Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Nagal Kala, Tehsil Chomu, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Presently House Number 08 Shiv Vatika, Kalwad Road, Govindpura, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Presently House Number-30, Krishna Nagar, Officer Enclave Kandira Marg, Jhotwara, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Gurjar, Adv., and Mr. Vipul Saxena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP and Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv., for complainant. [2025:RJ-JP:32303] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-7766/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/08/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.33/2025 registered at Police Station Jalupura, District Jaipur City (North) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(5) and 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that false allegation of embezzlement has been levelled against the petitioners. They further submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. They argue that charge- sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. They contend that the petitioners are in custody since 04.06.2025 and 12.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that alleged offences [2025:RJ-JP:32303] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-7766/2025] are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Naresh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Mahadev Prasad and 2. Narendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Babulal Yadav shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the [2025:RJ-JP:32303] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-7766/2025] notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observation made herein above is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-320-321