Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26554 (PNJ)

MAJOR SINGH v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS

CWP/4363/2025 · 2025-03-20

Deepinder Singh Nalwa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 122 MAJOR SINGH PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (ORAL) directions to the respondents the petitioner for the purpose of retiral benefits. reliance on the Power Corporation Ltd. and Another 19.03.2019). IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MAJOR SINGH VS. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Mr. Jugam Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sethi, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (ORAL) In the present writ petition, the petitioner is praying for directions to the respondents to count the work the petitioner for the purpose of retiral benefits. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgement of this Court in “ Power Corporation Ltd. and Another” (CWP No.11081 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CWP No.4363 of 2025 Date of Decision:20.03.2025 ...... PETITIONER PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED ..... RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA for the petitioner. DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (ORAL) t writ petition, the petitioner is praying for to count the work-charge service rendered by the petitioner for the purpose of retiral benefits. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has placed “Simarjit Singh vs. Punjab State CWP No.11081 of 2015, decided on t writ petition, the petitioner is praying for charge service rendered by Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has placed Simarjit Singh vs. Punjab State decided on POONAM SHARMA 2025.03.22 02:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP No.4363 of 2025 -2- Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on the instructions from the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if, at this stage, direction is given to respondent No.3 to decide his representation dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure P-13) in a time bound manner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 does not have any objection if the representation dated 19.06.2024 (Annexure P-13) is decided by respondent No.3. In view of the statement given by the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the legal notice (Annexure P-13) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE MARCH 20, 2025 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable Yes/No POONAM SHARMA 2025.03.22 02:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document