Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26551 (KAR)

K.R. CHIDAMBARA v. GENERAL MANAGER

WP/13191/2020 · 2025-07-22

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:36778 WP No. 13191 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 13191 OF 2020 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: K.R. CHIDAMBARA PROP: KUSHAL ENTERPRISES S/O. RADHAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO. 1, 12TH BLOCK, SBM LAYOUT, SRIRAMPURA, 2ND STAGE, MYSURU-570 034. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RADHAKRISHNA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. GENERAL MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, HUBBALI -580 031. 2. DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, MYSURU -570 001. 3. ADDL. DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, MYSURU - 570 001. 4. SENIOR SIGNAL AND TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, MYSURU - 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANDRACHUD A.,CGSPC) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ISSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT, THE SENIOR Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:36778 WP No. 13191 of 2020 DIVISIONAL SIGNAL & TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY MYSURU TERMINATING THE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT (CAMC) AGREEMENT OF WORKS NO.2153/2019/S AND T/09 DATED:31.05.2019 AT ANNX-V DATED:02.03.2020 BY SHORT CLOSURE OF THE CONTRACT VIDE ANNX-Z/5. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER On 14.08.2024 this Court adjourned the matter noting the following order: ''This matter is listed today upon the specific request of the learned counsel for petitioner as he is from outstation and that he would come personally to Court and address the arguments. However, learned counsel for the petitioner absent even when the matter is called on three occasions. Finally, list this matter on 09.09.2024 making it clear if arguments are not addressed on the next date of hearing appropriate orders would be passed including dismissal of the petition.'' None appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case was called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Thus it is clear that the petitioner is not intending to prosecute this matter. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:36778 WP No. 13191 of 2020 Learned counsel for the respondents is present. Petition is dismissed for non prosecution with the cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the Karnataka High Court Legal Services Committee . SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20