Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2655 (GAU)

DEWAN ABDUL QUAYEM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS

WP(C)/7008/2025 · 2026-02-10

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010266562025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7008/2025 DEWAN ABDUL QUAYEM SO LATE DEWAN ABDUL KADER, RO VILL BAHMURA, PS BARPETA, PO SONKUCHI, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM,PIN 781314 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY OF THE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY 6 2:THE DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 19 3:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER EDUCATION BARPETA 4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BARPETA 5:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BARPETA 6:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER MANDIA BLOCK BARPETA 7:THE HEAD MISTRESS 1122 NO BARPETA NURSERY CUM PRIMARY SCHOOL Page No.# 2/2 BARPET Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HUSSAIN, MR S A BARBHUYAN,MR. SURAJIT DAS Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 11.02.2026 Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondent authorities and therefore, the matter has become infructuous. Mr. P.K. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department is present. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed as having been become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant