KULDEEP LAKHERWAL AND ORS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/16504/2024 · 2025-01-10
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26539 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26539 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.16252 of 2024 alongwith
connected matters
Decided on: 10th January, 2025 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CWP No.16252 of 2024 Karnail Singh and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CWP No.16502 of 2024 Pardeep Kumar and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CWP No.16504 of 2024 Kuldeep Lakherwal and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petitions.
3.
Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring representation(s) within two weeks from today. In case such a representation(s) is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 10, 2025
Judge Mukesh