[2025:RJ-JP:32240] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9837/2025 1. Virendra @ Veeru S/o Harkesh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ulupura, Police Station Bhusawar, At Present Khedali Mode, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail Bharatpur). 2. Ajay @ Titu S/o Harkesh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ulupura, Police Station Bhusawar, At Present Khedali Mode, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Sharma, Mr. Rahul Sharma & Ms. Chanchal Sharma for Mr. Fateh Ram Meena For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Devendra Raj Jain for Mr. Ved Prakash Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.415/2024 registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 140(3) & 307 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 117(2), 118(1) & 110 of BNS, 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:32240] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9837/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that none of the injuries sustained by the injured has been opined as dangerous to life. It is submitted that as per medical opinion, two injuries found on the non-vital part of the body have been opined as grievous in nature. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that as many as 14 injuries have been found on the person of the injured out of which, two are grievous in nature. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the nature of injuries and the fact that grievous injuries have been found on the non-vital part of the body of injured, as also considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:32240] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9837/2025] 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – (1) Virendra @ Veeru S/o Harkesh, and (2) Ajay @ Titu S/o Harkesh, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /222