Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26536 (PNJ)

GURMIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/9345/2025 · 2025-03-19

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (226) Gurmit Singh State of Punjab CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN petitioner in case (4), 324(5), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 added later on) 2. while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation. 3. Singh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no longer required. 4. 18.02.2025 absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the conditions of Section 5. expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 19.03.2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurmit Singh Versus State of Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr.Manjot Singh Gujral, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Dy. A.G., Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.004 dated 26.01.2025 ), 324(5), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 added later on), registered at Police Station Dhilwan, District Kapurthala. Vide order dated 18.02.2025, a Coordinate Bench while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his todial interrogation is no longer required. In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the conditions of Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9345-2025 Date of Decision:- 19.03.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Dy. A.G., Punjab. The present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the 26.01.2025, under Sections 304, 324 ), 324(5), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Section 229 of BNS Dhilwan, District Kapurthala. a Coordinate Bench of this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Paramjeet submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his todial interrogation is no longer required. In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the of BNSS, 2023. However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE ……Petitioner ……Respondent The present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the 304, 324 Section 229 of BNS of this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the Paramjeet submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final Manju 2025.03.21 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document