IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Deenbandhu Chhotu and Technology, Murthal Sunita and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. date passed in LPA No. 128 of 2023 of Haryana and others 12.05.2025 vs Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science and Technology, Murthal Versus and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. GREWAL Mr. Jagbir Singh, Advocate, for the Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Tejasvi Sheokand, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Middha, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Inder Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondent Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. The appeal is allowed. For reasons date passed in LPA No. 128 of 2023 –Virender Kumar and others vs State Haryana and others. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 217 of 2023 (O&M) Reserved on : 24th April, 2025 Pronounced on: 12th May, 2025 Ram University of Science … Appellant …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA H. S. GREWAL , Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Arjun Sheoran, Advocate and Mr. Tejasvi Sheokand, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Pankaj Middha, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Inder Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondent-AICTE. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent nos. 6 to 8. reasons, see detailed order of even Virender Kumar and others vs State (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (H. S. GREWAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No (O&M) April, 2025 May, 2025 of even Virender Kumar and others vs State VARINDER SINGH 2025.05.14 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and authencity of this order/judgment