'^y APHC010375432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2224 OF 2018 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 dated 08.01.2018, in Crl.M.P.No.3075/2017 in C.C.No.20 of 2003 on the fiie of the Court of Metropoiitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatna Between: of Cr.P.C., against the order m. Pulleia Gopaia Krishna, S/o. Late P.V Ramanayya, Aged Advocate, R/o Door No. 50-59-8, Rajendranagar, Akkayapaiem Visakhapatnam. 45 years, Post, ...PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court 2. Suresh Finance Corporation, Represented by its Proprietor, Mr. Yadavalli Suresh Babu, Aged 29 Years, Business, R/o D.No.8-45-16 Vidyanagra, Chinawaltair, Visakhapatnam 3. Yadavalli Suresh Babu, S/o. Y.V Satyanarayana, Aged 29 years, Visakhapatnam. Business, R/o D.No.8-45-16 Vidyanagra, Chinawaltair ...RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI E VV S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) . Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010375432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2224/2018 Between: PULLELA GOPALA KRISHNA, R/0 DOOR NO. 50-59-8, RAJENDRANAGAR, AKKAYAPALEM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2.SURESH FINANCE CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. YADAVALLI SURESH BABU BUSINESS VIDYANAGRA,CHINAWALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM 3.YADAVALLI SURESH BABU, R/0 D.NO.8-45-16 VIDYANAGRA, CHINAWALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM AGED 29 D.NO.8-45-16 YEARS, R/0 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: EVVS RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: As seen from the judgment of the learned Trial Court in C.C.No.20 of 2003 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakahpatnam, Hence the Criminal Revision Case may be was ended in dismissal. dismissed as infructuous. 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 //TRUE COPY// To 1. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Sri E VV S Ravi Kumar Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi 5. Three CD Copies SAM at at TAC HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC No. 2224 of 2018 o gf 2 2 SEP 2025 Co ^SsCurrentSectjwjXW' DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS