Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26517 (RAJ)

PURANMAL SON OF SHRI RAMJILAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/12153/2025 · 2025-08-13

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31499] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12153/2025 Puranmal Son Of Shri Ramjilal Gurjar, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Gram Panchayat Tarwala, Tehsil Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food And Civil Supplies And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector (Supply), Khairthal-Tijara (Raj). 3. District Supply Officer, Khairthal-Tijara (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta with Ms. Sudha Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Hamir Singh Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/08/2025 1. The present petition pertaining to allotment and other issues pertaining to fair price shops. The competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him. 2. Learned AAG, Mr. S.S. Naruka has taken a preliminary objection that the matters primarily pertain to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. However, learned AAG is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due [2025:RJ-JP:31499] (2 of 2) [CW-12153/2025] audience and considering the representation of the petitioners, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 3. In light of the submissions made by learned AAG, this Court deems it proper to dispose of these petitions with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector in-between 26.08.2025 and 27.08.2025 at and around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shops qua the disputed sites will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioner, if he is aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/49