Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26513 (PNJ)

CHANCHAL GUPTA v. RAJ RANI DHIMAN

COCP/691/2023 · 2025-09-08

Harpreet Kaur Jeewan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

212 CHANCHAL GUPTA RAJ RANI DHIMAN CORAM: Present: HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) 1. order dated 17.10.2019 (Annexure P respondent was granted the relief of pre 20.01.2019, under Sections 406 at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala (Haryana) on the basis of settlement between the parties in the Med this Court. 2. respondent did not make the entire payment of Rs.1,50,000/ settled between the parties as such the criminal proceedings initiating on the basis of the said FIR. It is further contended that the petitioner is pursuing the prosecution of the respondent before the trial Court and trial is continuing. 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-691 Date of Decision : 08 CHANCHAL GUPTA VERSUS RAJ RANI DHIMAN CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET Mr. H.S Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) Present petition has been filed alleging willful disobeying the order dated 17.10.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court, whereby the ent was granted the relief of pre 20.01.2019, under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala (Haryana) on the basis of settlement between the parties in the Med this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent did not make the entire payment of Rs.1,50,000/ settled between the parties as such the parties did not move for quashing of e criminal proceedings initiating on the basis of the said FIR. It is further contended that the petitioner is pursuing the prosecution of the respondent before the trial Court and trial is continuing. In the present case, notice of motion was issued IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 691-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08-09-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) Present petition has been filed alleging willful disobeying the 1) passed by this Court, whereby the ent was granted the relief of pre-arrest bail in FIR No.20 dated of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala (Haryana) on the basis of settlement between the parties in the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent did not make the entire payment of Rs.1,50,000/- which was parties did not move for quashing of e criminal proceedings initiating on the basis of the said FIR. It is further contended that the petitioner is pursuing the prosecution of the respondent before the trial Court and trial is continuing. In the present case, notice of motion was issued on 02.03.2023. KAUR JEEWAN Present petition has been filed alleging willful disobeying the 1) passed by this Court, whereby the arrest bail in FIR No.20 dated of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala (Haryana) on the basis of iation and Conciliation Centre of The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the which was parties did not move for quashing of e criminal proceedings initiating on the basis of the said FIR. It is further contended that the petitioner is pursuing the prosecution of the respondent on 02.03.2023. SAPNA GOYAL 2025.09.10 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-691-2023(O&M) -2- 4. As per the order dated 17.07.2023, the petitioner was directed to file a fresh and complete address of the respondent within a period of two weeks as the notice issued to the respondent was received back unserved with the report that he is not residing at the given address. 5. Thereafter, correct address of the respondent was not filed and again when the matter was taken up on 06.08.2024, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the complete address has been filed. 6. However, as per the office report, fresh notice issued to the respondent has been again received back unserved with the report that address is not correct. As per the office report, the dasti notice issued to the respondent was not received back served or otherwise. Since 2023, the present petition is pending for service of the respondent, but correct address has not been supplied by the petitioner. 7. It appears that petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition, consequently the present petition is stands dismissed for want of non-compliance of the orders to file correct address of the respondent. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 08-09-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.09.10 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document