Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26510 (RAJ)

SUNDARAM SON OF MUKAHRAM v. SMT. VIMLA DEVI WIDOW OF SHRIRAMJILAL

CRES/122/2022 · 2025-04-25

Ganesh Ram Meena

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:17659] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 122/2022 IN S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.597/2018 Sundaram Son Of Mukahram, Resident Of Bakhuwali, Tan Jodhpura, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Vimla Devi Widow Of Shriramjilal, Resident Of Dhani Dherawali Tan Bilwa, Tehsil Khetri, District Sikar (Raj.). 2. Umrao Son Of Late Shri Ramjilal, Minor Through Their Mother And Natural Guardian Smt. Vimla Devi. Resident Of Dhani Dherawali Tan Bilwa, Tehsil Khetri, District Sikar (Raj.). 3. Kumari Sushila Daughter Of Shri Ramjilal, Minor Through Their Mother And Natural Guardian Smt. Vimla Devi.resident Of Dhani Dherawali Tan Bilwa, Tehsil Khetri, District Sikar (Raj.). 4. Kumari Somwati Daughter Of Shri Ramjilal, Minor Through Their Mother And Natural Guardian Smt. Vimla Devi.resident Of Dhani Dherawali Tan Bilwa, Tehsil Khetri, District Sikar (Raj.). 5. Master Kapil Son Of Shri Ramjilal, Minor Through Their Mother And Natural Guardian Smt. Vimla Devi.resident Of Dhani Dherawali Tan Bilwa, Tehsil Khetri, District Sikar (Raj.). 6. National Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office Station Road, Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 7. Chiraguddin Son Of Shri Yasin Khan, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Sirohi, Tehsil Neema Ka Thana, Presently Resident Of Nanglesaledisingh, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:17659] (2 of 2) [CRES-122/2022] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 25/04/2025 Application bearing No.13/2023 has been filed by the applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons mentioned in the application No.13/2023, same is allowed and delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The present restoration application has been filed by the applicant for restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.597/2018, which was dismissed in default vide order dated 28.06.2022. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, same is allowed and S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.597/2018 is ordered to be restored at its original number and position. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /39