- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT PETITION NO. 14075 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MS X NAME OF THE PETITIONER HAS NOT BEEN DISCLOSED. THE PETITIONER IS A MINOR AND A VICTIM OF SEXUAL OFFENCE. HENCE, NON-DISCLOSURE OF HER NAME IS IN COMPLIANCE OF THE DIRECTIONS PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P.NO. 6763 OF 2020 AND OF THE HONBLE APEX COURT IN NIPUN SAXENA VS. UNION OF INDIA (2019) 2 SCC 703 THE PETITIONER IS REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR PRASHANTHA C., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O CHANDRAPPA, RESIDING AT ARAHALLI, BANGARPETE, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563101. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. AVANI CHOKSHI.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLAR WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563101. 3. DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY BENGALURU, DISTRICT SESSIONS COURT ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563101. REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY. 4. S.N.R. DISTRICT HOSPITAL KOLAR, BANGARPET ROAD, GOWRIPET, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563101. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SURGEON. 5. CHILD WELFARE COMMITTEE MYSURU, KOLAR K.G.F. MASKAM, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563113. REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRPERSON. 6. DISTRICT CHILDREN PROTECTION UNIT KOLAR DISTRICT CHILD PROTECTION UNIT, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563101. REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT CHILD PROTECTION OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR.,HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ON INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO TAKE NECESSARY STEPS TO TERMINATE THE PREGNANCY OF THE PETITIONERS DAUGHTER AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. 2. The petitioner is knocking the doors of this Court seeking Medical termination of the Pregnancy on the ground that she was minor and it was sexual assault on her which came to be subject matter in Crime No.30/2025 of Kolar Women Police Station which is registered for offences punishable under Sections 4(2) and 5(L) of the Protection of Child from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 65(1) of BNS, 2023. The petitioner having suffered the said crime on her during her minority and became pregnant and now knocking the doors of this Court seeking Medical Termination of Pregnancy. 3. On 08.05.2025 this Court had passed the following order; - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 “Learned AGA takes notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Issue notice to the other respondents. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Considering the urgency in the matter, the petitioner is referred to Medical Board constituted by the State Government under Section 3(2)(b) of The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Amendment Act, 1971, to determine the age of pregnancy and the risk involved in the medical termination of pregnancy at this advanced stage. If the Board is of the opinion that the termination of pregnancy could be carried out without endangering the life of the petitioner, in view of Explanation-2 to Section 3 of the Amendment Act, it can form an opinion for termination of medical pregnancy, refer the petitioner to the Victoria Hospital/Vanivilas Hospital, Bengaluru, forthwith for the purpose and report the same to this Court. List on 20.05.2025” - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 4. Subsequent to it, the Medical Board has examined the petitioner and ultimately has opined as below; “Based on the above examinations and opinion, Miss X D/o Prashanth aged 15 years, Primi with 26+5 weeks of gestation for medical termination of pregnancy, the medical board at Vani Vilas Hospital is of the opinion that termination of pregnancy can be considered in this patient” 5. It is pertinent note that the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 are clear in saying that for the purposes of the Section where any, pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by such pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman. Section 3(2)(a) and (b) read with Explanation 2 makes it clear that the pregnancy may be terminated within 24 weeks of the pregnancy. The Act is silent about the termination of pregnancy beyond the period of 24 weeks. As on the date - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 of the examination, the medical opinion is that there is single live intrauterine gestation of 26 weeks +2days +/- 03 weeks. In the light of it, it appears that the gestation may be 23 weeks plus. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would rely on the judgment in the case of X Vs Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department1 reported in. In the said judgment it was held that right to reproductive autonomy has to be preserved and choice of pregnancy to continue or to terminate on the woman irrespective of her marital status is to be recognized. In similarly situated case, this Court has allowed the writ petition in W.P.No.6078/2025. 6. The afore quoted opinion indicates that the petitioner can undergo the medical termination of pregnancy and therefore, it would be necessary for directions to be issued to the Hospital to undertake the termination of pregnancy in view of the fact that the gestation period is indicated to be 26 weeks plus or minus 1 reported in 2023 (9) SCC 433 - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 03 weeks. Therefore, the writ petition deserved to be allowed. Hence, the following ORDER i) The writ petition is allowed. ii) Mandamus is issued to the State to direct Vani Vilas Hospital, Bangalore to carry out procedure for medical termination of pregnancy in terms of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules, 1971 forthwith. iii) The procedure is subject to further examination of the Doctor who has to conduct such a procedure and if in the opinion of the Doctor, such a procedure would cause any harm or injury to the life of the petitioner, the Doctor shall be the final deciding authority as to whether to go ahead or not with such a procedure. iv) The petitioner shall not be liable to make any payment towards such procedure. - 8 - NC: 2025:KHC:18304 WP No. 14075 of 2025 v) Parents or father of the petitioner is directed to take the child to the hospital. vi) In the event of the Doctor carrying out the Medical termination of Pregnancy, the biological sample of the fetus be preserved for investigation purposes. vii)The Registry to communicate to all concerned in this regard, including the Medical report of Vani Vilas Hospital, forth with. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 147