Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26510 (JHR)

M/S PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA v. THE UNION OF INDIA

Cont.(Cvl)/1127/2024 · 2025-06-24

Rajesh Shankar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:16744-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1127 of 2024 M/s Pawan Kumar Sharma, a proprietorship concern, having its Registered Office At: 18, Pandit Hata, Ward No. 2 (Old), P.O. & P.S.: Chakradharpur, District: Singhbhum West, represented through its sole proprietor Pawan Kumar Sharma, Aged about 62 years, Son of Late Sagarmal Sharma, Resident of 18, Pandit Hata, Ward No. 2(Old), P.O. & P.S.: Chakradharpur, District: Singhbhum West ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Vikash Anand, Father's name not known to the petitioner, The Director, Electrical Engineering (Rolling Stock), Floor No. 1, Room No. 113, Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Govt. of India, P.O., P.S. & District: New Delhi. 3. Sri Navin Kumar, Father's name not known to the petitioner, The Principal Chief Electrical Engineer, South Eastern Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata, P.O. & P.S.: Garden Reach, District: South 24 Parganas, Kolkata - 43 (West Bengal) … … ... Opposite Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishal Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Parties: Mr. Anil Kumar, ASGI Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, CGC --------- 04/Dated: 24.06.2025 Since the petitioner has remedy of challenging the order dt 07.01.2025 passed by the Railway Board/Opposite Party by way of fresh Writ petition, we are not inclined to entertain this Contempt Case. Therefore, this Contempt Case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order by way of a separate Writ petition. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) APK/VK