Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26507 (KAR)

ULLAS H v. CHANDRAMOHAN MINOCHA

CCC/567/2025 · 2025-06-19

C M Joshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21367-DB CCC No. 567 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 567 OF 2025 BETWEEN: ULLAS.H, EMP.ID. NO.673396, S/O HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: MANAGER ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, UNION BANK OF INDIA, (PRESENTLY WORKING AT VIJAYAWADA ARB AP), BANGALORE SOUTH -560 002. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI.HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI B. GOWDAR, ADV. (ABSENT)) AND: 1. CHANDRAMOHAN MINOCHA CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, (HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT), CENTRAL OFFICE, UNION BANK BHAVANA, Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21367-DB CCC No. 567 of 2025 NO.239, VIDHANA BHAVANA MARGA, MUMBAI-400 021. 2. ARAVINDA HEGDE, THE DEPUTY ZONAL HEAD, UNION BANK OF INDIA, HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, ZONAL OFFICE, BANGALORE, JEEVANA SAMPIGE, 2ND MAIN, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE -560 003. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. PRADEEP S. SAWKAR, ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 FOR FLAGRANT DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON’BLE SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.8562/2025(S-RES) DATED 27.03.2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21367-DB CCC No. 567 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Mr. Pradeep S. Sawkar states that, the direction given in the order dated 27.03.2025 in writ petition No.8562/2025 has been complied with. In this regard, he has drawn our attention to Page No.25 of the Contempt Petition, whereby the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of. Mr. Sawkar states that the said communication has been challenged by the petitioner in a separate Writ Petition being W.P.No.14665/2025. We find, there is no appearance for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE KGR* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45