Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010133392024
2025:GAU-AS:15810
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./837/2024 BINOD KUMAR SURANA S/O LATE PANNALAL SURANA, HOUSE NO. 38A, SHAKTI KUNJ, 2ND FLOOR, OPP. EARLY BIRD MONTESSORI SCHOOL, SHANTIPUR, GUWAHATI-9, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:NARENDRA SURANA S/O LATE PRITHWIRAJ SURANA R/O FLAT NO. MF-G SATYAM APARTMENT 7A/2 RAJPUR ROAD CIVIL LINES DELHI-11005 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K GARODIA, MR H BETALA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, S. K. GUPTA (R-2),MR. P SARMA (R-2),MR. T C DAS (R-2),MR. O P BHATI (R-2)
Page No.# 2/2 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 20.11.2025
1. Heard Mr. O.P Bhati, learned Senior Counsel representing the respondent No. 2, who submits that the proceedings which have been challenged in the instant revision are not maintainable in view of the amendment to Section 212(6) of the Companies Act and has conceded that the instant petition may be allowed. Also heard Mr. P.K Garodia and Mr. H Betala, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In view of the aforesaid contention of the learned Senior Counsel representing the respondent No. 2 and also having heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Ms. S Bora, the impugned proceeding C.R Case No. 21/2023 before the learned CJM, Kamrup(M) are hereby quashed. The petition stands allowed accordingly.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant