[2025:RJ-JP:802] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 436/2017 Radhey Shyam Sharma S/o Shri Gauri Lal Sharma, Director Shrimat Mahavir Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., By Cast, 379, Secretariat, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shrimat Mahaveer Buildcon Private Ltd., Represented Through Director And Authorized Representative, 12, Raghu Vihar, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur 2. Muhana Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd. Represented Through Liquidator 3. Shri Sunil Kumar Choudhary S/o Shri Amilal, 23-K-8, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur 4. Shri Suresh Kumar Saharan S/o Shri Sohan Lal Saharan, Temporary R/o House No. 10/20, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur And Permanet R/o Plot No. 91, Main Road, Choudhary Chetrams House, Dungarsinghpura, Sadulsahar, District Sri Ganganagar 5. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 6. Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Through Commissioner, Ram Kishor Vyas Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur 7. Deputy Commissioner, Zone No. 14, Jaipur Development Authority, Ram Kishor Vyas Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, Adv. for Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 07/01/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:802] (2 of 2) [CW-436/2017] By way of this petition, the petitioner No.7-defendant No.7(for short 'the defendant No.7') has challenged the order dated 03.12.2016 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge No.2, Jaipur, District Jaipur in Civil Suit No.02/2010 (126/2010), whereby the trial court while partly allowing the Temporary Injunction Application filed by the respondent-plaintiff (for short 'the plaintiff'), restrained the defendants to alienate or charge the suit property in any manner till disposal of the suit. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly in view of the fact that the suit was instituted before the trial Court in the year 2010 and about 14 years have been passed, instead of interfering with the impugned order, I dispose of the present writ petition with direction to the trial Court to decide the suit, if pending before it, expeditiously, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s), disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH GULERIA /37