2025:JHHC:16507 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7398 of 2024 ------ 1. Shahjahan Ansari, S/o Taiyab Ansari 2. Md. Taiyab Ansari @ Taiyab Mian, S/o Mahammad Miyan … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate Mr. Abhas Kr. Pandey, Advocate Mr. Jaishankar Tripathi, Advocate Mr. Pramod Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, A.P.P. Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate ----- 05/ 23.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.150 of 2024, for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Palamau. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioners and learned counsel representing the informant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail application. 4. The entire dispute arose in respect of possession of land. The parties are related to each other but the fact which cannot be lost sight of is that the petitioners have assaulted the informant. Further there are case and counter case filed by the parties. 2025:JHHC:16507 5. Since there is an allegation of assault, I direct the petitioners to appear before the concerned Court who will take into consideration the nature of injuries and thereafter will pass an appropriate order without being prejudiced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. 7. The Interlocutory Application being I.A. No.4899 of 2025 for early hearing stands dismissed, as the matter has been taken up and decided today. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3