IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4170 of 2025 Decided on: 9th May, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keshav Ram …..Petitioner Versus H.P. University and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Ranjana Devi, Advocate vice Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Ranjana Devi, Advocate vice Ms. Archna Dutt, learned counsel and Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, respectively. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 09, 2025 Judge Mukesh