Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26496 (GAU)

AJIT SARMAH v. PREETAM SAIKIA and ANR.

Cont.Cas(C)/252/2017 · 2025-11-18

Robin Phukan

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010023382017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/252/2017 AJIT SARMAH ASSISTANT TEACHER, BAPUSANG L.P SCHOOL, S/O- SRI PUNANANDA SARMAH, R/O- VILL- NAGAKHALIA, P.O- NAGAKHALIA, P.S- DHEMAJI, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM VERSUS PREETAM SAIKIA and ANR. COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, EDUCATIONELEMENTARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:SANJIB KR. BHUYAN DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-1 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.H MAZUMDER, MR.N BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A DEKA R-2, MR.D SAIKIA(Sr.Adv.)(R-2)(R-1),MR.R BORAH(R-2),MR.S M T CHISTIE(R-1) BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 19.11 .2025 Heard Mr. N. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. U. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the Page No.# 2/2 department. During the course of hearing, Mr. Borah submits that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has been appointed as Tutor by the contemnor with prospective effect and as such, this contempt petition may be closed by granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the appointment of the petitioner as Tutor. Prayer is allowed. Taking note of the submission of Mr. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition stands closed. However, liberty will remain with the petitioner to approach this Court again by filing appropriate petition challenging the condition laid in his appointment letter as Tutor. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE