IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15612 of 2025 Decided on: 26th September, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yugal Kishore …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajeet Singh Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be content if the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to decide his representation dated 17.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) in a time bound manner in view of the law laid down by this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024, titled as Mohit Sharma and Anr. Versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 29.11.2024. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 3. Prayer, being innocuous, is considered and allowed. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 17.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) within a period of six weeks from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order strictly in terms of the judgment passed in Mohit Sharma’s case (supra). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ( Virender Singh ) September 26, 2025 Judge R.Atal