1 2025:CGHC:18663 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 443 of 2020 1 - Manharan S/o Anand Ram Gond, Aged About 59 Years R/o Behind Nature City, Village Uslapur, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Shyama Bai Gond W/o Anand Ram Gond, Aged About 72 Years R/o Behind Nature City, Village Uslapur, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Motilal Netam, S/o Late Ramkhilawan Netam, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Dhangaon, Gosai, Post Dashrangpur, Tahsil Mungeli, Police Station Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Tikamlal Netam, S/o Late Ramkhilawan Netam, Aged About Not Known, R/o Village Dhangaon, Gosai, Post Dashrangpur, Tahsil Mungeli, Police Station Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chetan Maravi, S/o Late Panchram Gond, Aged About 35 Years R/o Behind Neturesity, Village Uslapur, Tahsil Takhapur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Maharinbai, W/o Late Panchram Gond, Aged About 55 Years R/o Behind Neturesity, Village Uslapur, Tahsil Takhapur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Advocate For State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, P.L. For respondent No. 3 : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.04.24 18:14:32 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 24-04-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that suit filed by the petitioners for declaration of title and permanent injunction was filed along with application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC but the application was rejected by the learned trial Court vide order dated 27.03.2018. She further submits that appeal was preferred against that order and same was dismissed vide order dated 15.04.2019. She contends that a direction may be issued to the learned trial Court to expedite the proceeding of the pending civil suit. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Taking into consideration the fact that suit was filed in the year 2017, learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make all endeavours to conclude the proceeding at the earliest. 4) With the aforesaid direction(s), instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya