Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26487 (JHR)

KAILASH RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6114/2024 · 2025-01-27

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6114 of 2024 --- 1. Kailash Ram son of Balmiki Ram 2. Shubham Kumar son of Sri Kailash Ram 3. Dheeraj Kumar son of Sri Kailash Ram Both are residents of Village- Belatand, P.O.- Baddiha, P.S.- Giridih(M), District- Giridih … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Officer-in-Charge, Giridih(M), District- Giridih 3. Ashok Ram @ Ashok Kumar Bhadani @ Puppi 4. Binod Ram @ Tunna Resp. Nos. 3 and 4 are the sons of Chotu Lal Ram 5. Ambodh Kumar Bhadani son of Ashok Ram @ Puppi 6. Manoj Chaudhary All are residents of Village Belatand, P.O.- Baddiha, P.S.- Giridih(M) District- Giridih …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mr. A.N. Deo, Advocate Ms. Karishma Kumari, Advocate For the Resp. Nos 1 & 2 : Mr. Binit Chandra, A.C. to A.A.G.-III Order No. 07 Dated: 27.01.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for restraining the respondents from entering the petitioners’ land appertaining to Khata No. 31, plot no. 512 measuring an area of 32 decimals and demolishing the boundary wall constructed over the same as, according to the petitioners, they/their predecessors-in-interest have been in possession of the said land for several decades. The rents of the said land have duly been paid in lieu of which rent receipts have also been issued. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after some argument, prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse of other remedies available under law for redressal of the aforesaid grievance. 3. Considering the said prayer, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Ritesh/ (Rajesh Shankar, J.)